Compass
|
Bates & Company, Inc.
|
Loan & Distribution Specialist AimPoint Pension
|
AimPoint Pension
|
Regional Vice President of Sales The Retirement Plan Company
|
Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
|
“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”
-- An attorney subscriber
Guest Article
(From the September 27, 2010 issue of Deloitte's Washington Bulletin, a periodic update of legal and regulatory developments relating to Employee Benefits.)
Responding to reports from group health plans and issuers that they need more time to comply with some of the additional requirements for internal claims review, the Department of Labor announced an "enforcement grace period" until July 1, 2011 for certain of the new requirements.
PPACA Imposed New Requirements
Effective for plan years beginning on and after September 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires non-grandfathered group health plans and group health issuers to provide enhanced internal claims review procedures. Interim final regulations, issued on July 23, 2010, implement the PPACA provisions and require plans to comply with the current ERISA claims procedures, but modified to further require, among other things, that:
|
Enforcement Grace Period Granted
After the interim regulations were issued, group health plans and issuers responded that some of the changes were unexpected and more time would be needed to comply. In turn, the Department of Labor announced this week that, until July 1, 2011, it would not take enforcement action against a group health plan that is working in good faith to comply (but is not yet compliant with) the new requirements to:
|
Along the same lines, the Department of Health and Human Services agreed to the same enforcement grace period with respect to self-funded nonfederal governmental plans. With regard to insured plans, the Technical Release states that the Labor Department is encouraging the states to provide similar grace periods for group health plan issuers, and the Department of Health and Human Services will not cite a state for failing to enforce the particular requirements in that case. See Technical Release 2010-02. The Labor Department also released a revised Model Notice of Adverse Benefit Determination that omits reference to the 24-hour time frame for urgent care decisions.
The information in this Washington Bulletin is general in nature only and not intended to provide advice or guidance for specific situations.
If you have any questions or need additional information about articles appearing in this or previous versions of Washington Bulletin, please contact: Robert Davis 202.879.3094, Elizabeth Drigotas 202.879.4985, Mary Jones 202.378.5067, Stephen LaGarde 202.879-5608, Bart Massey 202.220.2104, Tom Pevarnik 202.879.5314, Sandra Rolitsky 202.220.2025, Deborah Walker 202.879.4955. Copyright 2010, Deloitte. |
BenefitsLink is an independent national employee benefits information provider, not formally affiliated with the firms and companies who kindly provide much of the content and advertisements published on this Web site, including the article shown above. |