BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo
  
  

Search the News


Featured Jobs
Pension Administrator
Defined Contribution Pension Administrator
Defined Contribution Plan Administrator
Client Relations Manager
ERISA Legal Consultant
Enrolled Actuary
Head of Operations, Retirement Plans Service & Operations
DB Pension Analyst
DC Compliance Analyst
Account Manager
Search all jobs
 
Get the BenefitsLink app for iPhone and iPad LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook

Jump to content


Photo

Required Minimum Distribution Question


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 KD40

KD40

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 38 posts

Posted 24 June 2003 - 10:09 AM

Can someone answer the below question regarding RMD's?

A father works at a company in which he has no ownership, but his sons do, and they are greater than 5% owners. The father is 75 years of age and is still a full-time employee. Is he required to take a RMD payment or can he delay this payment till he terms? Was uncertain if the family attribution rules related to RMD payments.

#2 Blinky the 3-eyed Fish

Blinky the 3-eyed Fish

    Registered User

  • Sitewide Moderator
  • 3,364 posts

Posted 24 June 2003 - 10:24 AM

The 318 attribution rules apply and the father is considered owning the sons' shares. Thus, he must take RMD's.
"What's in the big salad?"
"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."