To BenefitsLink Home Page
To EmployeeBenefitsJobs Home Page
Get the BenefitsLink app for iPhone and iPad LinkedIn
Twitter
Facebook
Search the News


Featured Jobs
Plan Administration/ Employee Benefits/ Sales Support
Benefit Group: Sales Manager
Retirement Plan Administrators
Legal & Compliance Specialist
Conversion Manager
Conversion Consultant
Plan Consultant
Documents Coordinator
Relationship Manager
Plan Administrator II
Conversion Specialist
Retirement Leaders
Actuarial Consultant
ERISA Attorney
Account Manager
Salesperson
Employee Benefits Sales Consultant
Associate Vice President & Regional Sales Consultant
Search all jobs
 

 
 
 

Jump to content


Brother-Sister Controlled Group


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_named_Enda80_*

Guest_named_Enda80_*
  • Unregistered (or Not Logged In)

Posted 19 January 2008 - 08:42 PM

Hypothetical situation: Is is still a brother-sister controlled group if the same people own both companies, with substantially similar ownership shares in both cases, but there are no common employees in the two companies?

#2 John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA

John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA

    John Feldt, CPC, QPA

  • Registered
  • 1,673 posts

Posted 19 January 2008 - 10:43 PM

Yes, as long as both the 80% common and 50% identical tests for ownership are met (using 5 or fewer owners).

#3 bzorc

bzorc

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 263 posts

Posted 19 March 2008 - 08:11 AM

Let's make this a fun hypothetical. Assume both companies have employees (non common to both), and both companies maintain a 401(k) Plan. One company matches, the other doesn't. Wouldn't the controlled group rules require the nonmatching company to match, or vice-versa? That is, don't the benefits offered by both plans have to be identical? I have this exact situation going on now, where a brother-sister controlled group both set up 401(k) plans with non-similar features. This was brought to our attention just yesterday!

#4 Jim Chad

Jim Chad

    Registered User

  • Registered
  • 981 posts

Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:02 AM

NO, I do not think they would both have to offer the same match. I think they just have to pass coverage.

Think of this as if it were one company with 2 locations or 2 divisions. Depending on the mix of HCEs and NHCEs, it might pass coverage. And then, of course, you would have to do the ACP test. I think the ACP test would include only the participants in the division receiving a match.