Jump to content

Vesting for Cash Opt Out


Recommended Posts

Can an employer (fully insured) offer a greater cash opt out benefit based on years of service?

For example:

1st year = employee can take health insurance, or receive $50 per month

2nd year = employee can take health insurance, or receive $100 per month

3rd year = employee can take health insurance or receive $200 per month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?? Why would you do this? Isn't the purpose of an opt out incentive is to get people to make prudent financial decisions, both for you and them? If you want to reward longevity, do it elsewhere. Doesn't my longevity have added value to the org, even though I need insurance? Just a thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are absolutely excellent reasons to do this... which I won't get into here. Thanks for the response, but I was asking for possible compliance / legal issues with such a design. I do not see one, but I was thinking someone here could help confirm or deny that thought.

Anyone see any potential legal issues here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, this would pass non-discrimination testing. But good point if this was done for a really small employer. With large employers, I don't think its really an issue.

Although that is somewhat of a grey area issue... does non-discrimination testing apply to taxable benefits... like an opt out? I'd say no... because the general idea of testing is to make sure high wage earners pay taxes. Here, non taxable benefits (i.e. premium payments) are being converted into taxable wages... sooooo the IRS is getting paid. Don't see why they'd be unhappy with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...