BenefitsLink logo
EmployeeBenefitsJobs logo

Search the News

Featured Jobs
ESOP Administrator
Plan Administrator
Regional Sales Consultant
ESOP Administrator
Defined Contribution Pension Administrator
401(k) Daily Processor
Regional Sales Consultant
401(k) Daily Valuation Administrator
401(k) Daily Relationship Manager
Senior Retirement Plan Administrator
Senior Employee Benefits Account Manager
Retirement Education Specialist
ERISA Attorney
Search all jobs
Get the BenefitsLink app for iPhone and iPad LinkedIn

Jump to content

"Significant" change in the cost of medical insurance

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_named_S WINK_*

Guest_named_S WINK_*
  • Unregistered (or Not Logged In)

Posted 13 July 1999 - 04:59 PM

Does anyone know what the IRS means by "significant cost of coverage changes", found in A-6(B)? The employer I work with is having a 9% increase in medical insurance premiums mid-year (that's mid cafeteria plan year). Is 9% considered significant? The employer would like for their employees to be able to drop or change their current coverage at this time.

#2 Guest_named_KIP KRAUS_*

Guest_named_KIP KRAUS_*
  • Unregistered (or Not Logged In)

Posted 16 July 1999 - 08:27 AM

I've never sean a spicific example as to what the IRS considers a signicant increase. They proably don't know either, but I might consider a 9% increase in an employee's contribution a significant encrease.
If the 9% increase is applied to , say a $50/mo contribution resulting in an additional $54 per year it may not be considered significant to one person ,but could to another.

On the other hand, if the 9% is applied to a $150 contribution resulting in an additional increase of $162 per year such an increase may be significant to everyone.
Unless you can come across some spcific IRS guidelines, I suggest using your best judgement.

#3 Guest_named_SLuskin_*

  • Unregistered (or Not Logged In)

Posted 20 July 1999 - 05:15 PM

Even if there is a significant increase, the employee can only revoke the election if he/she prospectively elects similar coverage. If there is no alternative coverage, the employee is stuck with the increase.

#4 Guest_named_S WINK_*

Guest_named_S WINK_*
  • Unregistered (or Not Logged In)

Posted 20 July 1999 - 06:34 PM

Thank you both for your reply.
I did speak with Harry Beker this morning regarding this employer. He said basically what you both said. The IRS feels that 'significant' is a subjective term, and would depend on the makeup of the employer.
Also, if the employer is going to consider the rate increase significant, the employees have two options: They could keep their current election and accept the increase in premium- At which time the employer would make the corresponding change to the employee's pre-tax deduction. OR They could revoke their current election and receive coverage under another health plan with similar coverage. What I did not realize here is that under this option the new election must still be offered or allowed thru the employer under payroll deduction. This could include individual policies- which I personally would not advise. Mr. Beker said that no other elective adjustments are allowed unless there has been a change in family status.
Anyway, thank you guys for the info. By the way, we are seeing IRS audit activity in Texas.