To BenefitsLink home page           EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com is where the best employers find the best candidates!

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Adventures at 10
Tom Poje
post Dec 30 2005, 09:08 AM
Post #1


Moderator


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 26-August 98
From: Florida (land of hot humid summers)
Member No.: 1,560



this is my first
looksee at 10...

Nondiscrimination report: Overall Report

The sort is by RateGrpID, which appears to assign a number to each HCE alphabetically.
however, when my report prints, it sorts in the following manner

1
10
11
12
13
2
3
4
5 etc.
Thus people at the end of the alphabet get sandwhiched between the other employees. I imagine there is someway to set something in Crystal to make this work, but since I don't know how....
fortunatelly the report is in Crystal so easy to modify. In fact I was able to add an item that will tell how many additional NHCEs are needed if the nondiscrim classification test fails on an individual. well heck, an idiot like me finds that useful.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bernie lomax
post Dec 30 2005, 09:29 AM
Post #2


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 6
Joined: 10-February 04
From: Franklin, TN
Member No.: 12,831



Do you mind sharing the report?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Poje
post Dec 30 2005, 09:45 AM
Post #3


Moderator


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 26-August 98
From: Florida (land of hot humid summers)
Member No.: 1,560



I don't mind sharing as long as it is understood I have tried this on one plan, and only one plan, though I can't see how the calculation logic would change.
On the report I have included the number of NHCEs, number of HCEs, total testable ees, NHCE concentration % and midpoint.
report should check to see if an HCE ratio % > midpoint, if not then it multiplies the midpoint by the HCE ratio % * total # of NHCE. then it subtracts the # of NHCEs benefiting to produce the number of additional NHCEs needed. (well, I add .5 and then round)


by the way, I doubt this will run from custom, so it would 'replace' the existing Relius report. this is the landscape version. you would probably want to rename the actual Relius report just so you dont lose it if this report doesn't work.

This post has been edited by Tom Poje: Dec 30 2005, 09:48 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rcline46
post Dec 30 2005, 01:22 PM
Post #4


Registered User


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 1,254
Joined: 24-February 00
Member No.: 3,694



Tom, don't you realized this is a character field, not a numeric field, and therefore the sort is 'correct'.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fredman
post Dec 30 2005, 02:39 PM
Post #5


Bounty Hunter


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 181
Joined: 1-December 98
From: Kamino
Member No.: 506



What if you create a new formula field that checks the length of RateGrpID and if equal to one, add a leading zero to it. For example...

if length({RPTPLANGNDRATEGRPTEST.RATEGRPID} ) = 1 then
'0' + {RPTPLANGNDRATEGRPTEST.RATEGRPID}
else
{RPTPLANGNDRATEGRPTEST.RATEGRPID}

If you have more than 100 HCEs, you would need two leading zeros for lengths of 1 and an additional if/then to add a leading zero to lengths 2 characters.

Then in the formula "@Rate Group / HCE Name" replace {RPTPLANGNDRATEGRPTEST.RATEGRPID} with {@name of the formula} above.

This should now sort like...
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
etc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Poje
post Jan 3 2006, 07:55 AM
Post #6


Moderator


Group: Sitewide Moderator
Posts: 3,933
Joined: 26-August 98
From: Florida (land of hot humid summers)
Member No.: 1,560



Fredman: I simply modified to sort on name.

RCline: I did not know that the sort was on a character field. In that case, that is one of the most stupid sorts I have ever seen in a report.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 01:10 AM