To BenefitsLink home page           EmployeeBenefitsJobs.com is where the best employers find the best candidates!

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) · 0 New Messages

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Correction: Failure to Distribute
Randy Watson
post Jul 30 2009, 01:12 PM
Post #1


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 411
Joined: 25-February 04
Member No.: 12,906



I'm trying to determine whether the failure to make a distribution is eligible for correction under 2008-113. I'm looking at Section V.D(2)(a) in particular, which allows a correction of "an amount that should not have been deferred compensation under the plan" that is "otherwise treated as defered compensation under the plan and such excess amount otherwise would have been paid to the servive provider during the service provider's taxable year in which the excess amount was...otherwise treated as defered comepnsaiton under the plan".

It appears that this Section was drafted for deferrals that exceeded the participant's deferral election. It does not specifically reference amounts that should have been distributed. However, an amount that should have been distributed under the plan but wasn't certainly "should not have been deferred compensation under the plan" for the remainder of that tax year. In addition, the amount was "otherwise treated as deferred compensation under the plan." Am I reaching too far on this interpretation?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
XTitan
post Jul 30 2009, 02:11 PM
Post #2


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 77
Joined: 4-November 05
Member No.: 15,271



Since V.D makes no mention of underpayments, I think that you fall to VI.C or VII.D depending on the size of the missed payment.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Randy Watson
post Jul 30 2009, 02:32 PM
Post #3


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 411
Joined: 25-February 04
Member No.: 12,906



QUOTE (XTitan @ Jul 30 2009, 03:11 PM) *
Since V.D makes no mention of underpayments, I think that you fall to VI.C or VII.D depending on the size of the missed payment.


Yes, the fact that those Sections clearly allow for the correction of this kind of failure makes me even less confident that I could use V.D.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
XTitan
post Nov 3 2009, 02:22 PM
Post #4


Registered User


Group: Registered
Posts: 77
Joined: 4-November 05
Member No.: 15,271



On the other hand, I had a client's counsel say that V.D did apply to an underpayment of distribution. Go figure.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Fast ReplyReply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 12:57 AM