QUOTE
Originally posted by Vinny
Vanguard is pretty acceptable with its involvement in the SnP; wide diversification. I'm curious, who you chose as your "broker" will determine what options are available to you? I figured any institution that caters to IRA's would have the same access as the next company? Am I wrong to believe that?
The main choices for custodian of an IRA are banks, brokerages and mutual funds. Yes, the types of investments that are offered vary by custodian although it seems like the trend is for a growing overlap in options. Even within a broad class of custodians you will find a range of investments options.
Banks: they may offer just CDs (common for example at a small thrift) or they may have in-house mutual funds or even some kind of brokerage tie. Banks generally offer the more conservative investment options. They are local and offer counter service, but a lot of banks lag in "modern" services like internet access and may not offer a complete range of investment options.
Brokerages: traditionally brokerages started with an emphasis on advisor-makes-the-picks style investing, but this has involved into self directed stock picking, discount services and finally internet pick-by-click. Brokerages also used to sell LOADED funds, but this has evolved to brokerages offering hundreds of LOADED and NO LOAD mutual funds (like Schwab and Etrade). Today, most brokerages offer a range of services (with a range of costs) that run from do it yourself intenet to full service hand holding. The later is ussually a much more expensive option. Brokerage access to mutual funds start with their in-house funds, but access to the funds of other firms depends upon the deals they have struck with those firms. Some mutual funds do not want to participate in the cost share and choose to be independent or brokerages. Others like the "recruiting" that the brokerages do for building their asset base.
Mutual funds: a mutual fund in its simplest form is a company that offers participation in a cluster of investments (called a portfolio, could be stocks, bonds or other investment options) where the citizen gets ownership in a diversified package. There are thousands of mutual funds, often clustered in "families" like Vanguard, Fidelity, T Rowe Price, Scudder, etc. They key issues with mutual funds include:
FUND FOCUS: like Baskin Robbins ice cream, mutual funds come in many flavors with a key distinction being what is the allowed investments or fund focus. There are also structural issues such as LOADED vs NO LOAD. LOADED mutual fund refers to any fund that has built in commissions either on the front end or back end. NO LOAD funds have been slowly displacing LOADED funds as modern marketing and economies of scale take over. The NO LOAD fund has annual expenses, but no percent commission. In theory, a LOADED fund has a commission to pay the "salesperson" and these commissions used to be 5-7% up front. Market pressure has forced many LOADED funds to trim those costs, or hide them as back end fees (when the account assets are larger!) or dangle the phased out fee system (commission drops if you stay with the fund for many years). An INDEX fund is a fund based upon a list (like the Wilshire 5000 stocks or S&P 500) and therefore no analysts, no company visits, no hotels/meals/flights, etc. which are reflected in significantly lower annual expenses.
As a person just getting started, you need to avoid getting confused by the thousands of choices. A beginner IRA owner needs just one or two good investment vehicles. If you are young, I highly recommend starting with a broad based equity (aka stock) fund that is NO LOAD. The Vanguard Index funds are reasonable examples of this, but many mutual funds and brokerages offer similiar funds. I recommend a NO LOAD fund because you are not stuck with fees if the fund performs poorly. I recommend equities because the stock market over many decades reflects the growth and success of capitalism and gives a better return than IOU based investments like bonds and CDs. I recommend starting with one fund for perhaps 5 to 10 years because a fund gives you diversification, removes you from single stock picking, and is relatively low maintenance. You have a life to live, and when you IRA assets are relatively modest, why spend hours thinking about investments. It just isn't neccessary. It may seem crazy, but people who spend a lot of time thinking about investments are not likely to out perform an index fund. The reason is because the extremely low annual expenses drains off very little of your assets, while frequent switching often increases annual expenses and folks have a nasty habit of selling low (in panic, like right now) and buying high (in euphoria like the late 1990s). Smart investors stay detached from market emotion and do just the opposite: buy low and sell high.... or atleast they try to, it is just not very easy to figure out what is high and what is low.
You do not need to put the maximum annual ammount into an IRA to get started. You can do a monthly fixed amount, or a single lump, or periodic small investments...the choice is yours. The Roth is an excellant tax shelter for building wealth. I suggest that you ignor the daily/weekly/monthly investment "news" and commit yourself to the big picture of building a retirement nest egg over the long haul. I have friends who have built IRA accounts to hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars and in many cases spent less than four hours a year thinking about "choices". Getting started is more important that what specific investment choice you make. Over time you will learn more about investing and be more comfortable with the decision process. You can't get there if you don't get started.
Post again if you have additional questions.