Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Plan integration .... 2.7% vs 2.4%
BenefitsLink Message Boards > Retirement Plans > Retirement Plans in General
Moe Howard2
I've seen many defined contribution plan documents that describe the steps in allocating employer contribution when the plan is integrated. All the documents I've seen used " 2.7% " in one of the steps. It seems that " 2.7% " is standardly used.

But lately I've seen a couple of plan documents that use "2.4%". Integration in one of those plans was tied to 80% of the FICA base. So I assumed that the 2.4% came from 80% x 3% = 2.4%. But another plan document used 2.4% and made no metion of 80%.

My Question: Apparently 2.7% is not the standard that must be used all the time. So how is the 2.4% derived? When can 2.4% be used? Are any %'s allowed other than 2.7 and 2.4 ?
maverick
Moe, you may have been looking at top heavy plans that allocate the 3% top heavy contrib first. So for a plan integrated at 100% of the TWB, 5.7% is reduced to 2.7%. Max disparity for a plan integrated at 80% of the TWB is 5.4%, so 5.4% - 3.0% = 2.4%.
Moe Howard2
mav: What is max disperity for a plan integrated at 70% of the TWB ?
WDIK
If the integration level is greater than 80% but less than 100% of the TWB, the 5.7% must be reduced to 5.4%.

If the integration level is greater than the greater of $10,000 or 20% of the TWB, but not more than 80%, 5.7% must be reduced to 4.3%.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.