Sure,
In order for the amount to be a true ‘return-of-excess’, the
Net Income Attributable (NIA) must accompany the excess contribution that is removed on a timely basis.
The key is to ensure that the instructions submitted to the financial institution clearly show that the transaction is a ‘return of excess contribution’ and not a regular distribution. Unfortunately, this is a mistake that is often made when completing the forms, resulting in no earnings/losses being removed with the excess and the amount being reported as a regular taxable distribution.
Even if the proper instructions are submitted to the financial institution, someone should follow-up to make sure it is processed correctly- as mistakes are sometimes made by financial institutions.
In short:
----The correct amount should be removed
----If the amount is removed by the deadline, the NIA must be included. The instruction to the financial institution should distinguish the excess amount and the NIA, unless the financial institution calculates the amount
----If the amount is removed timely, and processed properly, the taxable amount in box 2a should reflect only earnings
Note: Since the NIA could be a loss, it is possible that the amount received from the IRA for the transaction is less than the amount contributed to the IRA. If that situation arises, the IRA owner may want to include a letter with the check, and a copy of the calculation, to show how the amount was determined.
Please post any follow-up questions.
Denise