JanetM
Jan 24 2008, 02:00 PM
Guy is my office just showed me the news on stimulus package. He makes $145,000 and his wife doesn't work. He's tickled pink that he's going to get check for $1,200.
Anyone know if the "couple" limit will require the wife to also have earned income.
masteff
Jan 24 2008, 02:23 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/24/eco...ulus/index.htmlThis article at CNN just says "per couple who paid income tax and who filed jointly".
But people on the borderline shouldn't jump for joy too fast, as no telling if they'll use 2006 AGI or what to calculate who gets a check. So your coworker might double check what other income he had in 2006 as it might have pushed him over the limit.
And of course all bets are off until the ink dries.
EDIT: here's another good article which speaks to how quickly we might (not) expect to see these rebate checks coming.
http://www.kansas.com/news/story/290530.html
JanetM
Jan 24 2008, 02:45 PM
Thanks for the link Masteff. I hope they clarify the details quick. The office is buzzing and speculation rampant.
masteff
Jan 24 2008, 02:51 PM
Here's another titillating tidbit to tease your coworkers with....
this article on Yahoo says:
"The rebates would phase out gradually for individuals whose income exceeds $75,000 and couples with incomes above $150,000, aides said. Individuals with incomes up to $87,000 and couples up to $174,000 would get partial rebates. The caps are higher for those with children."
So a few more people might sneak in for partial rebates (only fair versus a hard cut off at $150K).
JanetM
Jan 24 2008, 02:55 PM
Perfect..... Thanks again.
david rigby
Jan 24 2008, 03:51 PM
Perfect?
More proof that the folks in DC have never balanced a checkbook, or a budget.
jevd
Jan 25 2008, 02:02 PM
Treasury release on packageSee above for information on proposed package.
I bet it changes before it becomes final.
jevd
Jan 29 2008, 03:08 PM
QUOTE (jevd @ Jan 25 2008, 12:02 PM)

Treasury release on packageSee above for information on proposed package.
I bet it changes before it becomes final.
and here is the House version. $1200 for Joint Filers. No mention of two wage earners that I can see. Just approved in the House.
Here HR 5140.
masteff
Jan 29 2008, 03:42 PM
QUOTE (jevd @ Jan 29 2008, 02:08 PM)

Here HR 5140.
Link didn't quite work (message: "Search results are only retained for a limited amount of time")... go here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5140.IH:
jevd
Jan 29 2008, 03:43 PM
QUOTE (masteff @ Jan 29 2008, 01:42 PM)

QUOTE (jevd @ Jan 29 2008, 02:08 PM)

Here HR 5140.
Link didn't quite work... go here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c110query.htmlUnder "enter search" switch "word/phrase" to "bill number" and enter HR 5140
Sorry. It must have been a temporary link.
masteff
Jan 29 2008, 03:49 PM
Note: I edited my last post to have a direct link (finally found how to get there directly, not exactly straight forward).
Question: anyone else noticed that the $300 per child is based on the child tax credit and therefore the kid has to be under 17? (People in the office were talking and asked me if I knew anything about it; thanks to jevd for the link to the actual bill).
Also, reading the bill, the check you get will be based on your 2007 status but the actual credit will be calculated based on your 2008 tax return. (Anyone read it differently?)
JanetM
Jan 30 2008, 09:51 AM
Wow, in just a couple days the ideas they have come up with on the Hill. Lets not extend unemployment - lets just require some kind of training to get benefits. Health care workers are in demand, lets retrain folks to do those jobs.
As far as the increase for food stamps - sure that just give the high school drop listening to her Ipod or chatting on her cell phone, while her kids run rampant, more to spend on DVDs.
Okay, I am a bit cranky today.
masteff
Feb 7 2008, 05:32 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080207/ap_on_...conomy_stimulusHere's the latest. Senate passed a similar package that added seniors and veterans to the list of people to receive checks.
Below Ground
Feb 8 2008, 04:48 PM
Janet, I think you are right to be a little cranky.
JanetM
Feb 11 2008, 04:19 PM
Thanks.................
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.