QUOTE (Kevin C @ Aug 5 2009, 10:22 AM)

My, my, someone is cranky. If you don't think a discussion about whether a disclaimer of benefits constitutes prohibited assignment or alienation that includes cites might be useful, perhaps you can provide some useful information for the OP.
ANY incorrect action or inaction regarding a qualified plan can create a liability issue.
There are DB plans that provide pre-retirement death benefits even if the surviving spouse is not the beneficiary.
If they pay the benefit despite the surviving spouse's objection, what are they going to do when the uncashed checks become stale, are voided and the amounts are credited back to the plan account?
I questioned the relevance of citing to a GCM on disclaimers as an alternative to paying benefits to a suviving spouse because of the high risk to the plan of not complying with the complex tax law provisions for disclaimers which will require the assistance of counsel when as I indicated in my previous post the simple non risky solution is to just pay the benefits to the spouse without asking for consent. assuming of course that the plan pays benefits to non spouses who have been designated under the plan. There are very few DB plans that will incur the unnecessary cost of paying benefits to non spouses as well as the gift tax consequences of such transfers.
Under the IRC the benefits are taxed to the spouse when they are mailed regardless of whether the checks are cashed. Sooner or later the spouse will start cashing the checks to offset the tax liability on the 1099.
Under PBGC reg 4006.6(b)(1)(iii) an individual ceases to be a participant for premium purposes at death.