Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Loan & Distribution Specialist

AimPoint Pension
(Remote)

AimPoint Pension logo

Business Development Director

AimPoint Pension
(Remote / Pompano Beach FL / AL / GA)

AimPoint Pension logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company, Inc.
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company, Inc. logo

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon

16 Matching News Items

1.  Supreme Court Rejects the Moench Presumption
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
June 25, 2014
"The Supreme Court rejected any presumption, effectively disagreeing with every circuit court to decide the issue ... The Supreme Court also addressed Fifth Third's concerns about being between a rock and a hard place in that they can be sued if the price goes down and they keep the stock in the plan or can be sued if the stock price them goes up and they haven't put it back in. The Supreme Court seemed to sympathize but still held that the presumption of prudence was not the solution ... [T]he Supreme Court made clear that the securities laws trump ERISA law.... [T]he Court has now required the lower courts to consider whether a claim to stop purchasing or a claim to inform the public would hurt the participants more than doing nothing." [Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, No. 12-751 (S. Ct. June 25, 2014)]
2.  Fidelity Settles Lawsuit with Own Employees Over 401(k) ERISA Allegations
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Aug. 12, 2014
"[The] settlement agreement provides for $12 million to be paid to the class and for .. affirmative relief [including]: [1] The Plan will make available a wide selection of both Fidelity and non-Fidelity mutual funds.... [2] Fidelity is increasing auto-enrollment for eligible employees from 3% to 7% of eligible compensation, and will default current participants who are currently deferring below 7% to 7% of eligible compensation. Fidelity will apply its match to those increased contributions. [3] The Plan shall provide that revenue sharing attributable to non-Fidelity mutual funds shall be credited to participants in the same way as revenue attributable to Fidelity mutual funds and collective trusts pursuant to the 8th amendment to the 2005 restatement of the Plan is credited to participants."
3.  John Hancock Dodges ERISA Class Action
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Sept. 30, 2014
"The cases are holding with few exceptions that the functional fiduciary test under 3(21)(A)(i) must show that the fiduciary actually exercised their discretion. In decisions in favor of AUL and John Hancock, the plaintiffs were unable to show that. In decisions against Transamerica, MassMutual, and ING, the plaintiffs were able to either show the exercise of discretion or that it was a issue of fact for trial.... The open question from these cases is whether 3(21)(A)(iii) requires the actor to actually exercise their discretion or not, i.e. it's a fiduciary breach to be both malfeasant and nonfeasant."
4.  MassMutual Settles Excessive Fee Lawsuit
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Nov. 3, 2014
"The settlement agreement ... allows for two settlement classes to be approved: [1] the Monetary Relief Class and [2] the Structural Changes Class. The Monetary Relief Class covers current and past retirements plan customers of MassMutual, while the Structural Changes Class covers current and future retirement plan customers of MassMutual.... [T]he lawsuit brought by MassMutual's own employees is not affected by this lawsuit[.]" [Goldenstar, Inc. v. MassMutual Life Ins. Co., No. 11-cv-30235-MGM (D. Mass., settlement agreements part 1 and part 2 filed Oct. 31, 2014)]
5.  Supreme Court Grants Cert in Tibble v. Edison International
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Oct. 2, 2014
"[T]he Supreme Court [had] requested the opinion of the Solicitor General of the United States along with the Department of Labor in asking whether cert should be granted for the two issues that Plaintiffs sought to have heard. The first, regarding the six year statute of limitations found in ERISA was granted after the Solicitor General recommended that the Court take the case[.]"
6.  Federal District Court Grants Summary Judgment to Plaintiffs in Church Plan Case
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
July 22, 2014
"In finding for the plaintiffs that the pension plan should be governed by ERISA, the court rejected defendants' argument that it was inequitable or unfair because of the long term reliance on the IRS rulings and that either the ERISA or a California state law statute of limitation applies. The court also found that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to Dignity Health's predecessor Catholic Healthcare West establishing the pension plan, rather than that they were either controlled by a church or that a church co-established the plan." [Rollins v. Dignity Health, No. 13-cv-01450-TEH (N.D. Cal. July 22, 2014)]
7.  Some Additional Thoughts on Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
July 2, 2014
"[It] is important to understand that risk has not been created or destroyed by this decision. The risk was always present. Under Moench, ESOP participants bore most of the risk. But under this decision, ESOP fiduciaries will not bear most of the risk either. Instead, this case was all about shifting a portion of the risk back to ESOP fiduciaries rather than ESOP participants, but leaving it somewhere in the middle.... ESOP fiduciaries should consider treating their company stock investment with the same exacting fiduciary standards they are treating the plan's other investments.... Here are items they should consider[.]"
8.  After 13 Years, Haddock v. Nationwide Settles for $140,000,000
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Dec. 15, 2014
"Originally filed in 2001, the lawsuit concerned the plaintiffs' allegation that Nationwide received undisclosed revenue sharing payments from non-proprietary mutual funds in violation of ERISA.... The settlement also calls for extensive non-monetary relief ... [T]his is the most substantial settlement ever in an ERISA fiduciary breach case involving the receipt of revenue sharing by a service provider."
9.  Supreme Court Declines to Hear Appeal of Tussey v. ABB
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Nov. 11, 2014
"The Supreme Court does not provide a reason why they decline to hear appeals. However in this instance, there are at least a few speculative guesses. First, they have already agreed to hear two ERISA cases this term, with one being Tibble v. Edison... Second, on the issue of deference which was the heart of plaintiffs' appeal, the district court will get to decide that issue for the first time." [Tussey v. ABB, Inc., No. 12-2056 (8th Cir. Mar. 19, 2014; cert. denied Nov. 10, 2014)]
10.  $140 Million Settlement: What It Means to Your Retirement Plan Practice
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Jan. 13, 2015
"Present all products offered by a single-covered service provider (CSP) that your prospect or client qualifies to purchase.... If the CSP offers the same investment option in multiple share classes, present your recommended menu with each share class, ... Identify which investment options are proprietary, non-proprietary, and sub-advised, and identify the cost impact ... Disclose the gross and net operating expense ratio, the 12b-1, and any other indirect fee by fund.... Provide the [retirement plan fiduciary] with an estimate of the revenue sharing expected for each fund at the beginning of the plan year and a final tally of the revenue sharing paid for each fund at the end of the year."
11.  MassMutual Settlement Provides Guidance on Fiduciary Governance
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Nov. 10, 2014
"[B]efore signing a service agreement with any covered service provider (CSP), the following questions should be considered by the responsible plan fiduciary(ies): ... [1] Does our CSP provide a notice of any additions and deletion from the menu of options? [2] Does any CSP have the discretion to remove an investment from the menu without the prior authorization of the responsible plan fiduciary? ... [3] Does the responsible plan fiduciary have the option of using investment alternatives that do not provide any indirect payments to the CSP? [4] Does the CSP have the discretion to unilaterally adjust their compensation?"
12.  Eighth Circuit Denies Both Rehearing Petitions in Tussey v. ABB
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
May 22, 2014
"Without explanation, both the original panel of three judges and the court en banc, meaning all active judges of the 8th Circuit, declined to rehear the case.... If the Supreme Court declines to hear either party's appeal in Tussey, then the case will ultimately be remanded back to the district court to re-decide the investment claims under an abuse of discretion standard. And in that scenario, the following issues will be considered final regardless of the remand: [1] Fidelity will have succeeded in defeating all claims against it, and [2] ABB will have have been found liable for paying excessive recordkeeping fees to Fidelity." [Tussey v. ABB, Inc., No. 12-2056 (8th Cir. Mar. 19, 2014)]
13.  Court Finds Catholic Hospital Plan is a Church Plan, Dismisses Plaintiff's Claim
FRA PlanTools and The Lowenbaum Partnership Link to more items from this source
May 9, 2014
"[T]he court here found that the use of the phrase 'includes' rather than 'subject to' made the difference in the court's interpretation that Section (A) [of ERISA section 3(33), codified at 29 U.S.C. 1002(33),] was not a 'gatekeeper' to Section (C). Notably, the court did not directly address the fact that the word 'established' is missing from the second part of Section (C), which was so important to the previous two court's decisions." [Overall v. Ascension et al., No. 13-11396 (E.D. Mich. May 9, 2014)]
14.  MassMutual Is Found to Be a Fiduciary in ERISA Suit by Proposed Class of Customer Plans
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
May 27, 2014
"After conducting an extensive analysis of both old and recent case law on the functional fiduciary tests under ERISA 3(21)(i) and (iii) ... [the court] found that MassMutual was a functional fiduciary because it controlled its own compensation ... [but] found that MassMutual was not a fiduciary with respect to the change of or potential changing of investments in the [Separate Investment Accounts] ... [T]hese decisions seem to be based on a combination of which circuit the lawsuit is brought in and the specific practices of each insurance company in how they are setting up and operating their separate account investments as part of the group annuity contracts offered." [Golden Star v. MassMutual Life Insurance Co., No. 3:11-30235-PBS (D. Mass. May 20, 2014)]
15.  Another Court Finds Pension Plan of Church-Affiliated Hospital Is Subject to ERISA
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Jan. 5, 2015
"Ruling in line with the courts in Rollins v. Dignity Health and Kaplan v. Saint Peter's, the court here finds that only a church may establish a church plan. Because Advocate Health acknowledges that it is not a church, it therefore cannot sponsor a plan that falls within the church plan exemption to ERISA." [Stapleton v. Advocate Health, No. 14-C-0187 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 31, 2014)]
16.  Court in Boeing Excessive Fee Case Denies Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment, Sets Trial Date
The Lowenbaum Partnership and FRA PlanTools Link to more items from this source
Jan. 5, 2015
"This decision makes two things clear. First, the ERISA plaintiff's bar has refined the claims being brought and/or argued since Hecker and has doubled down on conflicts of interest.... Second, Hecker doesn't have teeth anymore...maybe just baby molars. Possibly it's greatest lasting truth is that service providers such as Fidelity are not fiduciaries when they design a products such as a line up of funds." [Spano v. Boeing, No. 3:06-CV-743-NJR-DGW (S.D. Ill. Dec. 30, 2014)]

Your Search Options

  • If you have selected the Any Word radio button, above:

    Enter a single word, or as many words as you'd like (perhaps some synonyms). An item will match if it contains any one of the words.

    If you enter several words, the search engine will determine which words are the most important. So you can enter a question. Or you can paste an excerpt of several paragraphs from an article on another website to find similar news items on BenefitsLink.

  • If you have selected the All Words radio button, above:

    Enter several words. An item will match only if it contain every one of the words.

  • If you have selected the Advanced radio button, above:

    Certain words and punctuation take on special meanings—

    • Quotation marks can be used to require an exact phrase, such as
      "standard of review"
    • The words AND, OR and NOT become logic operators, which are especially powerful when used with parentheses, such as
      (vested OR vesting OR lifetime) AND (retiree OR retirement) AND (health OR healthcare) AND (benefits OR coverage)
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.