Employee Benefits Jobs
|
Webcasts and Conferences
|
|
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of IRS Notice and Request for Comment: Form 1094-B, Transmittal of Health Coverage Information Returns and Form 1095-B, Health Coverage
"The IRS developed Form 1094-B and Form 1095-B under the authority of IRC section 6055, added by [the ACA] ... Section 6055(a) requires every health insurance issuer, sponsor of a self-insured health plan, government agency that administers government-sponsored health insurance programs and other entity that provides minimum essential coverage to file annual returns reporting information for each individual for whom minimum essential coverage is provided. Form 1094-B, serves as a transmittal for Form 1095-B, Health Coverage."
(Internal Revenue Service [IRS])
|
|
[Official Guidance]
Text of IRS Notice and Request for Comment: Form 1095-A, Health Insurance Marketplace Statement
"The IRS developed Form 1095-A ... for individuals to compute the amount of premium tax credit to which they are entitled under the [ACA] and file an accurate tax return. Marketplaces also must report certain information monthly to the IRS about individuals who receive from the Marketplace a certificate of exemption from the individual shared responsibility provision."
(Internal Revenue Service [IRS])
|
[Guidance Overview]
California Repeals 60-Day Waiting Period Limitation (PDF)
"The confusion between the California 60-day limit and the ACA's 90-day limit was exacerbated by regulations that the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health & Human Services recently issued permitting an 'orientation period' of no longer than one calendar month as a permissible condition of substantive eligibility for plan coverage. Sponsors of insured plans that provide benefits to California residents must still follow the California 60-day waiting period limitation through the end of 2014. However, starting in 2015, only the ACA's 90-day limit on eligibility waiting periods will apply."
(Buck Consultants at Xerox)
|
ACA May Benefit More Small Businesses in the Fall
"[I]nsurance companies encouraged business owners to renew their plans before the October 2013 deadline to avoid having to sign up for a new policy during the first year of the controversial ACA rollout.... As a result, not as many businesses needed to look for new policies for their employees as was originally projected. To be successful, SHOP exchanges must attract a large pool of businesses that can exert market pressure on insurance carriers and ultimately bring down prices. Whether that will happen remains to be seen."
(Kaiser Health News)
|
Are Health Care Costs in Retirement Really So High?
"[A] typical couple currently 65 years old could expect health care costs over their lifetimes, excluding long-term care, to run about $191,000 (with a 5% chance of exceeding $311,000). Adding in the cost of long-term nursing care, the average figure for a couple aged 65 rises to $260,000 (with a 5% chance of exceeding $570,000). To be sure, those are still high numbers, but assuming the two people combined have average life expectancies of 80, that works out to about $12,750 a year for the couple, well below a $10,000 annual, per-person cost. Why are the numbers at such odds?"
(On Wall Street)
|
How SHOP Exchanges Could Be So Much Better This Year
"[T]he biggest barrier to enrollment in this past year, the first for the SHOP, was the fact that many states focused most of their Marketplace resources and volunteer time on coverage for individuals.... Other factors discouraging enrollment for small businesses ... included the limited reach of tax credits, the low number of brokers and agents steering their clients to SHOP plans, and technological problems.... The study also showed a surprising lack of awareness of even the most basic features of the SHOP in the small-employer community."
(Wolters Kluwer Law & Business)
|
Trouble Ahead for Public Marketplace Auto-Enrollment?
"The idea behind the auto-enrollment proposal was to allow consumers to avoid going through the HealthCare.gov enrollment process again and to ensure that the insured don't lose coverage. Here's the problem ... The APTC amount won't change, but premiums almost certainly will. Last year's subsidy amounts were pegged to the second-lowest-cost silver plan in the market. Based on proposed 2015 rates for nine markets, the benchmark plan would change in eight of them ... Moreover, no 834 information will flow from the federal exchange for members who wind up being auto-enrolled for 2015 unless the subscriber intentionally goes through the eligibility process again."
(HighRoads)
|
Benefits in General; Executive Compensation
|
|
|
Healthcare Reform in the U.S. Territories; Prepayment of Taxes for Puerto Rico Retirement Plans
"[1] [M]any mandates of the ACA may still apply to issuers and employers [in the U.S. Territories]. The recent letter from HHS has no impact on: [a] the requirements of the ACA that were incorporated into the Internal Revenue Code and [ERISA], or [b] the requirements of ... the ACA that apply to non-federal governmental plans.... [2] As a practical matter, retirement plans that are dual-qualified (i.e., qualified not only under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code but also under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code) cannot permit prepayment of taxes through distribution from the plan because prepayment of Puerto Rican taxes is not a distributable event under the U.S. Code."
(Ogletree Deakins)
|
|
Additional useful links:
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
1298 Minnesota Avenue, Suite H
Winter Park, Florida 32789
Phone (407) 644-4146
Fax (407) 644-2151
Lois Baker, J.D., President
David Rhett Baker, J.D., Editor and Publisher
Holly Horton, Business Manager
Copyright 2014
BenefitsLink.com, Inc.—but feel free to forward this
newsletter without further permission from us, if you do not
modify the newsletter in any way (including this lower
portion).
All materials contained in this newsletter are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be
reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed,
published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of BenefitsLink.com, Inc., or in the case of
third party materials, the owner of that content. You
may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or
other notice from copies of the content.
Links to Web sites other than those owned by
BenefitsLink.com, Inc. are offered as a service to
readers. The editorial staff of BenefitsLink.com, Inc.
was not involved in their production and is not
responsible for their content.
We are proud of our
Privacy Policy.
Thanks for reading this newsletter!
|