Subscribe (Free) to
Daily or Weekly Newsletters
Post a Job

Featured Jobs

Director of 3(16) Operations

Compass
(Remote / NH / Hybrid)

Compass logo

Retirement Plan Administrator

Bates & Company, Inc.
(Remote / Winter Park FL)

Bates & Company, Inc. logo

Loan & Distribution Specialist

AimPoint Pension
(Remote)

AimPoint Pension logo

Defined Benefit Combo Cash Balance Compliance Consultant

Loren D. Stark Company (LDSCO)
(Remote)

Loren D.  Stark Company (LDSCO) logo

Business Development Director

AimPoint Pension
(Remote / Pompano Beach FL / AL / GA)

AimPoint Pension logo

Regional Vice President of Sales

The Retirement Plan Company
(Remote / AL / FL / GA / MS)

The Retirement Plan Company logo

View More Employee Benefits Jobs

Free Newsletters

“BenefitsLink continues to be the most valuable resource we have at the firm.”

-- An attorney subscriber

Mobile app icon
LinkedIn icon     Twitter icon     Facebook icon
BenefitsLink editor's note: a PDF version of this document is available at https://benefitslink.com/taxregs/E6-11991.pdf (12 pages).

[Federal Register: July 31, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 146)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43056-43067]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31jy06-11]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 54

[TD 9277]
RIN 1545-BE30


Employer Comparable Contributions to Health Savings Accounts
Under Section 4980G

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 43057]]

SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide guidance
regarding employer comparable contributions to Health Savings Accounts
(HSAs) under section 4980G. In general, these final regulations affect
employers that contribute to employees' HSAs.

DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on July 31,
2006.
    Applicability Date: These regulations apply to employer
contributions to HSAs made on or after January 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mireille T. Khoury (202) 622-6080 (not
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This document contains final Pension Excise Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 54) under section 4980G of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Under
section 4980G of the Code, an excise tax is imposed on an employer that
fails to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of its employees.
    Section 1201 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (Act), Public Law 108-173, (117 Stat. 2066,
2003) added section 223 to the Code to permit eligible individuals to
establish HSAs for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2003.
Section 4980G was also added to the Code by the Act. Section 4980G(a)
imposes an excise tax on the failure of an employer to make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of its employees for a calendar year. Section
4980G(b) provides that rules and requirements similar to section 4980E
(the comparability rules for Archer Medical Savings Accounts (Archer
MSAs)) apply for purposes of section 4980G. Section 4980E(b) imposes an
excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount contributed by the
employer to the Archer MSAs of employees during the calendar year if an
employer fails to make comparable contributions to the Archer MSAs of
its employees in a calendar year. Therefore, if an employer fails to
make comparable contributions to the HSAs of its employees during a
calendar year, an excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount
contributed by the employer to the HSAs of its employees during that
calendar year is imposed on the employer. See Sections 4980G(a) and (b)
and 4980E(b). See also Notice 2004-2 (2004-2 IRB 269), Q & A-32. See
Sec.  601.601(d)(2).
    On August 26, 2005, proposed regulations (REG-138647-04) were
published in the Federal Register (70 FR 50233). The proposed
regulations clarified and expanded upon the guidance regarding the
comparability rules published in Notice 2004-2 and in Notice 2004-50
(2004-33 IRB 196), Q & A-46 through Q & A-54. See Sec.  601.601(d)(2)
of this chapter. Written public comments on the proposed regulations
were received and a public hearing was requested. The hearing was held
on February 23, 2006. After consideration of all the comments, these
final regulations adopt the provisions of the proposed regulations with
certain modifications, the most significant of which are highlighted in
this preamble.

Explanation of Provisions and Summary of Comments

    Several commentators requested that the effective date should be at
least one year from the date the regulations are finalized to give
employers sufficient time to implement changes required to comply with
the final regulations. The final regulations will apply to employer
contributions to HSAs made on or after January 1, 2007.
    An employer is not required to contribute to the HSAs of its
employees. In general, however, if an employer makes contributions to
any employee's HSA, the employer must make comparable contributions to
the HSAs of all comparable participating employees. Comparable
participating employees are eligible individuals (as defined in section
223(c)(1)) who are in the same category of employees and who have the
same category of high deductible health plan (HDHP) coverage. Under the
proposed regulations, the categories of coverage were self-only HDHP
coverage and family HDHP coverage. Several commentators recommended
that the final regulations should recognize additional categories of
coverage other than self-only and family HDHP. The final regulations
adopt this recommendation and allow family HDHP coverage to be
subdivided into the following additional categories of HDHP coverage:
self plus one, self plus two and self plus three or more. In addition,
the final regulations provide that an employer's contribution with
respect to the self plus two category may not be less than the
employer's contribution with respect to the self plus one category and
the employer's contribution with respect to the self plus three or more
category may not be less than the employer's contribution with respect
to the self plus two category.
    In addition, several commentators requested separate treatment for
groups of collectively bargained employees, such that employers' HSA
contributions to collectively bargained employees would not be subject
to the comparability rules. In response to these comments, the final
regulations provide that employees who are included in a unit of
employees covered by a bona fide collective bargaining agreement
between employee representatives and one or more employers are not
comparable participating employees, if health benefits were the subject
of good faith bargaining between such employee representatives and such
employer or employers. Collectively bargained employees are, therefore,
disregarded for purposes of section 4980G.
    Numerous commentators requested guidance on the exception to the
comparability rules for employer contributions made through a section
125 cafeteria plan. In response to these comments, the final
regulations provide additional guidance on how employer HSA
contributions are made through a cafeteria plan. Specifically, the
final regulations provide that employer contributions to employees'
HSAs are made through the cafeteria plan if under the written cafeteria
plan, the employees have the right to elect to receive cash or other
taxable benefits in lieu of all or a portion of an HSA contribution
(i.e., all or a portion of the HSA contributions are available as pre-
tax salary reduction amounts), regardless of whether an employee
actually elects to contribute any amount to the HSA by salary
reduction. The final regulations also provide several examples that
illustrate the application of the cafeteria plan exception to the
comparability rules.
    One commentator requested guidance on what actions an employer must
take to locate any missing comparable participating former employees
for purposes of contributions to eligible former employees. The final
regulations provide guidance on this issue and explain that an employer
making comparable contributions to former employees must take
reasonable actions to locate any missing comparable participating
former employees. In general, such reasonable actions include the use
of certified mail, the Internal Revenue Service Letter Forwarding
Program, see Rev. Proc. 94-22 (1994-1 CB 608), or the Social Security
Administration's Letter Forwarding Service. See Sec.  601.601(d)(2).
    Several commentators requested that testing for comparability
purposes be permitted on a plan year, rather than calendar year, basis.
Section 4980G mandates the use of a calendar year for testing purposes.
Accordingly, the final regulations do not adopt the suggestion for plan
year testing. Also, the final

[[Page 43058]]

regulations have removed and reserved the provision dealing with
instances where an employee has not established an HSA by the end of
the calendar year.
    Finally, one commentator requested clarification on what would
constitute reasonable interest for purposes of section 4980G. In
response to this comment, the final regulations provide that the
determination of whether a rate of interest used by an employer is
reasonable will be based on all of the facts and circumstances.
However, if an employer calculates interest using the Federal short-
term rate as determined by the Secretary in accordance with Code
section 1274(d), the employer is deemed to use a reasonable interest
rate.

Special Analyses

    It has been determined that these regulations are not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that
section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5)
does not apply to these regulations. These regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small entities, thus the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed regulations preceding these
regulations were submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.

Drafting Information

    The principal authors of these regulations are Barbara E. Pie and
Mireille T. Khoury, Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt and Government Entities).

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 54

    Excise taxes, Pensions, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 54 is amended as follows:

PART 54--PENSION EXCISE TAXES

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 54 is amended by adding
entries in numerical order to read, in part, as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
    Section 54.4980G-1 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 4980G. Section
54.4980G-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 4980G. Section 54.4980G-3
also issued under 26 U.S.C. 4980G. Section 54.4980G-4 also issued
under 26 U.S.C. 4980G. Section 54.4980G-5 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 4980G. * * *


0
Par. 2. Sections 54.4980G-0, 54.4980G-1, 54.4980G-2, 54.4980G-3,
54.4980G-4, and 54.4980G-5 are added to read as follows:


Sec.  54.4980G-0  Table of contents.

    This section contains the questions for Sec. Sec.  54.4980G-1,
54.4980G-2, 54.4980G-3, 54.4980G-4, and 54.4980G-5.
Sec.  54.4980G-1 Failure of employer to make comparable health
savings account contributions.

    Q-1: What are the comparability rules that apply to employer
contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
    Q-2: What are the categories of HDHP coverage for purposes of
applying the comparability rules?
    Q-3: What is the testing period for making comparable
contributions to employees' HSAs?
    Q-4: How is the excise tax computed if employer contributions do
not satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year?

Sec.  54.4980G-2 Employer contribution defined.

    Q-1: Do the comparability rules apply to amounts rolled over
from an employee's HSA or Archer Medical Savings Account (Archer
MSA)?
    Q-2: If an employee requests that his or her employer deduct
after-tax amounts from the employee's compensation and forward these
amounts as employee contributions to the employee's HSA, do the
comparability rules apply to these amounts?

Sec.  54.4980G-3 Employee for comparability testing.

    Q-1: Do the comparability rules apply to contributions that an
employer makes to the HSAs of independent contractors or self-
employed individuals?
    Q-2: May a sole proprietor who is an eligible individual
contribute to his or her own HSA without contributing to the HSAs of
his or her employees who are eligible individuals?
    Q-3: Do the comparability rules apply to contributions by a
partnership to a partner's HSA?
    Q-4: How are members of controlled groups treated when applying
the comparability rules?
    Q-5: What are the categories of employees for comparability
testing?
    Q-6: Are employees who are included in a unit of employees
covered by a collective bargaining agreement comparable
participating employees?
    Q-7: Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating employees who have
coverage under the employer's HDHP?
    Q-8: If an employee and his or her spouse are eligible
individuals who work for the same employer and one employee-spouse
has family coverage for both employees under the employer's HDHP,
must the employer make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both
employees?
    Q-9: Does an employer that makes HSA contributions only for one
class of non-collectively bargained employees who are eligible
individuals, but not for another class of non-collectively bargained
employees who are eligible individuals (for example, management v.
non-management) satisfy the requirement that the employer make
comparable contributions?
    Q-10: If an employer contributes to the HSAs of former employees
who are eligible individuals, do the comparability rules apply to
these contributions?
    Q-11: Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating former employees who
have coverage under the employer's HDHP?
    Q-12: If an employer contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP, must the employer make comparable contributions to
the HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals with
coverage under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a
COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1))?
    Q-13: How do the comparability rules apply if some employees
have HSAs and other employees have Archer MSAs?

Sec.  54.4980G-4 Calculating comparable contributions.

    Q-1: What are comparable contributions?
    Q-2: How does an employer comply with the comparability rules
when some non-collectively bargained employees who are eligible
individuals do not work for the employer during the entire calendar
year?
    Q-3: How do the comparability rules apply to employer
contributions to employees' HSAs if some non-collectively bargained
employees work full-time during the entire calendar year, and other
non-collectively bargained employees work full-time for less than
the entire calendar year?
    Q-4: May an employer make contributions for the entire year to
the HSAs of its employees who are eligible individuals at the
beginning of the calendar year (i.e., on a pre-funded basis) instead
of contributing on a pay-as-you-go or on a look-back basis?
    Q-5: Must an employer use the same contribution method as
described in Q & A-3 and Q & A-4 of this section for all employees
who were comparable participating employees for any month during the
calendar year?
    Q-6: How does an employer comply with the comparability rules if
an employee has not established an HSA at the time the employer
contributes to its employees' HSAs?
    Q-7: If an employer bases its contributions on a percentage of
the HDHP deductible, how is the correct percentage or dollar amount
computed?
    Q-8: Does an employer that contributes to the HSA of each
comparable participating employee in an amount equal to the
employee's HSA contribution or a percentage of the employee's HSA
contribution (matching contributions) satisfy the rule that all
comparable participating employees receive comparable contributions?
    Q-9: If an employer conditions contributions by the employer to
an employee's HSA on an employee's participation in health
assessments, disease

[[Page 43059]]

management programs or wellness programs and makes the same
contributions available to all employees who participate in the
programs, do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
    Q-10: If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating employees who have attained a
specified age or who have worked for the employer for a specified
number of years, do the contributions satisfy the comparability
rules?
    Q-11: If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs
of all comparable participating employees are eligible to make the
additional contributions (HSA catch-up contributions) under section
223(b)(3), do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
    Q-12: If an employer's contributions to an employee's HSA result
in non-comparable contributions, may the employer recoup the excess
amount from the employee's HSA?
    Q-13: What constitutes a reasonable interest rate for purposes
of making comparable contributions?

Sec.  54.4980G-5 HSA comparability rules and cafeteria plans and
waiver of excise tax.

    Q-1: If an employer makes contributions through a section 125
cafeteria plan to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual, are the contributions subject to the comparability
rules?
    Q-2: If an employer makes contributions through a cafeteria plan
to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual in an
amount equal to the amount of the employee's HSA contribution or a
percentage of the amount of the employee's HSA contribution (i.e.,
matching contributions), are the contributions subject to the
section 4980G comparability rules?
    Q-3: If under the employer's cafeteria plan, employees who are
eligible individuals and who participate in health assessments,
disease management programs or wellness programs receive an employer
contribution to an HSA, unless the employees elect cash, are the
contributions subject to the comparability rules?
    Q-4: May all or part of the excise tax imposed under section
4980G be waived?


Sec.  54.4980G-1  Failure of employer to make comparable health savings
account contributions.

    Q-1: What are the comparability rules that apply to employer
contributions to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?
    A-1: If an employer makes contributions to any employee's HSA, the
employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees. See Q & A-1 in Sec. 54.4980G-4 for
the definition of comparable contributions. Comparable participating
employees are eligible individuals (as defined in section 223(c)(1))
who are in the same category of employees and who have the same
category of high deductible health plan (HDHP) coverage. See sections
4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(3). See section 223(c)(2) and (g) for the
definition of an HDHP. See also Q & A-5 in Sec.  54.4980G-3 for the
categories of employees and Q & A-2 of this section for the categories
of HDHP coverage. But see Q & A-6 in Sec.  54.4980G-3 for treatment of
collectively bargained employees.
    Q-2: What are the categories of HDHP coverage for purposes of
applying the comparability rules?
    A-2: (a) In general. Generally, the categories of coverage are
self-only HDHP coverage and family HDHP coverage. Family HDHP coverage
means any coverage other than self-only HDHP coverage. The
comparability rules apply separately to self-only HDHP coverage and
family HDHP coverage. In addition, if an HDHP has family coverage
options meeting the descriptions listed in paragraph (b) of this Q & A-
2, each such coverage option may be treated as a separate category of
coverage and the comparability rules may be applied separately to each
category. However, if the HDHP has more than one category that provides
coverage for the same number of individuals, all such categories are
treated as a single category for purposes of the comparability rules.
Thus, the categories of ``employee plus spouse'' and ``employee plus
dependent,'' each providing coverage for two individuals, are treated
as the single category ``self plus one'' for comparability purposes.
See, however, the final sentence of paragraph (a) of Q & A-1 of
Sec. 54.4980G-4 for a special rule that applies if different amounts
are contributed for different categories of family coverage.
    (b) HDHP Family coverage categories. The coverage categories are--
    (1) Self plus one;
    (2) Self plus two; and
    (3) Self plus three or more.
    (c) Examples. The rules of this Q & A-2 are illustrated by the
following examples:

    Example 1. Employer A maintains an HDHP and contributes to the
HSAs of eligible employees who elect coverage under the HDHP. The
HDHP has self-only coverage and family coverage. Thus, the
categories of coverage are self-only and family coverage. Employer A
contributes $750 to the HSA of each eligible employee with self-only
HDHP coverage and $1,000 to the HSA of each eligible employee with
family HDHP coverage. Employer A's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.
    Example 2.  (i) Employer B maintains an HDHP and contributes to
the HSAs of eligible employees who elect coverage under the HDHP.
The HDHP has the following coverage options:
    (A) Self-only;
    (B) Self plus spouse;
    (C) Self plus dependent;
    (D) Self plus spouse plus one dependent;
    (E) Self plus two dependents; and
    (F) Self plus spouse and two or more dependents.
    (ii) The self plus spouse category and the self plus dependent
category constitute the same category of HDHP coverage (self plus
one) and Employer B must make the same comparable contributions to
the HSAs of all eligible individuals who are in either the self plus
spouse category of HDHP coverage or the self plus dependent category
of HDHP coverage. Likewise, the self plus spouse plus one dependent
category and the self plus two dependents category constitute the
same category of HDHP coverage (self plus two) and Employer B must
make the same comparable contributions to the HSAs of all eligible
individuals who are in either the self plus spouse plus one
dependent category of HDHP coverage or the self plus two dependents
category of HDHP coverage.
    Example 3. (i) Employer C maintains an HDHP and contributes to
the HSAs of eligible employees who elect coverage under the HDHP.
The HDHP has the following coverage options:
    (A) Self-only;
    (B) Self plus one;
    (C) Self plus two; and
    (D) Self plus three or more.
    (ii) Employer C contributes $500 to the HSA of each eligible
employee with self-only HDHP coverage, $750 to the HSA of each
eligible employee with self plus one HDHP coverage, $900 to the HSA
of each eligible employee with self plus two HDHP coverage and
$1,000 to the HSA of each eligible employee with self plus three or
more HDHP coverage. Employer C's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.

    Q-3: What is the testing period for making comparable contributions
to employees' HSAs?
    A-3: To satisfy the comparability rules, an employer must make
comparable contributions for the calendar year to the HSAs of employees
who are comparable participating employees. See section 4980G(a). See Q
& A-3 and Q & A-4 in Sec. 54.4980G-4 for a discussion of HSA
contribution methods.
    Q-4: How is the excise tax computed if employer contributions do
not satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year?
    A-4: (a) Computation of tax. If employer contributions do not
satisfy the comparability rules for a calendar year, the employer is
subject to an excise tax equal to 35% of the aggregate amount
contributed by the employer to HSAs for that period.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-4:

    Example. During the 2007 calendar year, Employer D has 8
employees who are eligible individuals with self-only coverage under
an HDHP provided by Employer D. The deductible for the HDHP is
$2,000. For the 2007 calendar year, Employer D contributes $2,000
each to the HSAs of two employees and $1,000 each to the HSAs of the
other six employees, for total HSA contributions of

[[Page 43060]]

$10,000. Employer D's contributions do not satisfy the comparability
rules. Therefore, Employer D is subject to an excise tax of $3,500
(35% of $10,000) for its failure to make comparable contributions to
its employees' HSAs.


Sec.  54.4980G-2  Employer contribution defined.

    Q-1: Do the comparability rules apply to amounts rolled over from
an employee's HSA or Archer Medical Savings Account (Archer MSA)?
    A-1: No. The comparability rules do not apply to amounts rolled
over from an employee's HSA or Archer MSA.
    Q-2: If an employee requests that his or her employer deduct after-
tax amounts from the employee's compensation and forward these amounts
as employee contributions to the employee's HSA, do the comparability
rules apply to these amounts?
    A-2: No. Section 106(d) provides that amounts contributed by an
employer to an eligible employee's HSA shall be treated as employer-
provided coverage for medical expenses and are excludible from the
employee's gross income up to the limit in section 223(b). After-tax
employee contributions to an HSA are not subject to the comparability
rules because they are not employer contributions under section 106(d).


Sec.  54.4980G-3  Employee for comparability testing.

    Q-1: Do the comparability rules apply to contributions that an
employer makes to the HSAs of independent contractors or self-employed
individuals?
    A-1: No. The comparability rules apply only to contributions that
an employer makes to the HSAs of employees.
    Q-2: May a sole proprietor who is an eligible individual contribute
to his or her own HSA without contributing to the HSAs of his or her
employees who are eligible individuals?
    A-2: (a) Sole proprietor not an employee. Yes. The comparability
rules apply only to contributions made by an employer to the HSAs of
employees. Because a sole proprietor is not an employee, the
comparability rules do not apply to contributions the sole proprietor
makes to his or her own HSA. However, if a sole proprietor contributes
to any employee's HSA, the sole proprietor must make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating employees. In
determining whether the comparability rules are satisfied,
contributions that a sole proprietor makes to his or her own HSA are
not taken into account.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-2:

    Example. In a calendar year, B, a sole proprietor is an eligible
individual and contributes $1,000 to B's own HSA. B also contributes
$500 for the same calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is
an eligible individual. The comparability rules are not violated by
B's $1,000 contribution to B's own HSA.

    Q-3: Do the comparability rules apply to contributions by a
partnership to a partner's HSA?
    A-3: (a) Partner not an employee. No. Contributions by a
partnership to a bona fide partner's HSA are not subject to the
comparability rules because the contributions are not contributions by
an employer to the HSA of an employee. The contributions are treated as
either guaranteed payments under section 707(c) or distributions under
section 731. However, if a partnership contributes to the HSAs of any
employee who is not a partner, the partnership must make comparable
contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating employees.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-3:

    Example. (i) Partnership X is a limited partnership with three
equal individual partners, A (a general partner), B (a limited
partner), and C (a limited partner). C is to be paid $300 annually
for services rendered to Partnership X in her capacity as a partner
without regard to partnership income (a section 707(c) guaranteed
payment). D and E are the only employees of Partnership X and are
not partners in Partnership X. A, B, C, D, and E are eligible
individuals and each has an HSA. During Partnership X's Year 1
taxable year, which is also a calendar year, Partnership X makes the
following contributions--
    (A) A $300 contribution to each of A's and B's HSAs which are
treated as section 731 distributions to A and B;
    (B) A $300 contribution to C's HSA in lieu of paying C the
guaranteed payment directly; and
    (C) A $200 contribution to each of D's and E's HSAs, who are
comparable participating employees.
    (ii) Partnership X's contributions to A's and B's HSAs are
section 731 distributions, which are treated as cash distributions.
Partnership X's contribution to C's HSA is treated as a guaranteed
payment under section 707(c). The contribution is not excludible
from C's gross income under section 106(d) because the contribution
is treated as a distributive share of partnership income for
purposes of all Code sections other than sections 61(a) and 162(a),
and a guaranteed payment to a partner is not treated as compensation
to an employee. Thus, Partnership X's contributions to the HSAs of
A, B, and C are not subject to the comparability rules. Partnership
X's contributions to D's and E's HSAs are subject to the
comparability rules because D and E are employees of Partnership X
and are not partners in Partnership X. Partnership X's contributions
satisfy the comparability rules.

    Q-4: How are members of controlled groups treated when applying the
comparability rules?
    A-4: All persons or entities treated as a single employer under
section 414 (b), (c), (m), or (o) are treated as one employer. See
sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(e).
    Q-5: What are the categories of employees for comparability
testing?
    A-5: (a) Categories. The categories of employees for comparability
testing are as follows (but see Q & A-6 of this section for the
treatment of collectively bargained employees)--
    (1) Current full-time employees;
    (2) Current part-time employees; and
    (3) Former employees (except for former employees with coverage
under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
    (b) Part-time and full-time employees. For purposes of section
4980G, part-time employees are customarily employed for fewer than 30
hours per week and full-time employees are customarily employed for 30
or more hours per week. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(4)(A) and
(B).
    (c) In general. Except as provided in Q & A-6 of this section, the
categories of employees in paragraph (a) of this Q & A-5 are the
exclusive categories of employees for comparability testing. An
employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees (eligible individuals who are in the
same category of employees with the same category of HDHP coverage)
during the calendar year without regard to any classification other
than these categories. For example, full-time eligible employees with
self-only HDHP coverage and part-time eligible employees with self-only
HDHP coverage are separate categories of employees and different
amounts can be contributed to the HSAs for each of these categories.
    Q-6: Are employees who are included in a unit of employees covered
by a collective bargaining agreement comparable participating
employees?
    A-6: (a) In general. No. Collectively bargained employees who are
covered by a bona fide collective bargaining agreement between employee
representatives and one or more employers are not comparable
participating employees, if health benefits were the subject of good
faith

[[Page 43061]]

bargaining between such employee representatives and such employer or
employers. Former employees covered by a collective bargaining
agreement also are not comparable participating employees.
    (b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-6. The examples read as follows:

    Example 1. Employer A offers its employees an HDHP with a $1,500
deductible for self-only coverage. Employer A has collectively
bargained and non-collectively bargained employees. The collectively
bargained employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
under which health benefits were bargained in good faith. In the
2007 calendar year, Employer A contributes $500 to the HSAs of all
eligible non-collectively bargained employees with self-only
coverage under Employer A's HDHP. Employer A does not contribute to
the HSAs of the collectively bargained employees. Employer A's
contributions to the HSAs of non-collectively bargained employees
satisfy the comparability rules. The comparability rules do not
apply to collectively bargained employees.
    Example 2. Employer B offers its employees an HDHP with a $1,500
deductible for self-only coverage. Employer B has collectively
bargained and non-collectively bargained employees. The collectively
bargained employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
under which health benefits were bargained in good faith. In the
2007 calendar year and in accordance with the terms of the
collective bargaining agreement, Employer B contributes to the HSAs
of all eligible collectively bargained employees. Employer B does
not contribute to the HSAs of the non-collectively bargained
employees. Employer B's contributions to the HSAs of collectively
bargained employees are not subject to the comparability rules
because the comparability rules do not apply to collectively
bargained employees. Accordingly, Employer B's failure to contribute
to the HSAs of the non-collectively bargained employees does not
violate the comparability rules.
    Example 3. Employer C has two units of collectively bargained
employees--unit Q and unit R--each covered by a collective
bargaining agreement under which health benefits were bargained in
good faith. In the 2007 calendar year and in accordance with the
terms of the collective bargaining agreement, Employer C contributes
to the HSAs of all eligible collectively bargained employees in unit
Q. In accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining
agreement, Employer C makes no HSA contributions for collectively
bargained employees in unit R. Employer C's contributions to the
HSAs of collectively bargained employees are not subject to the
comparability rules because the comparability rules do not apply to
collectively bargained employees.
    Example 4. Employer D has a unit of collectively bargained
employees that are covered by a collective bargaining agreement
under which health benefits were bargained in good faith. In
accordance with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement,
Employer D contributes an amount equal to a specified number of
cents per hour for each hour worked to the HSAs of all eligible
collectively bargained employees. Employer D's contributions to the
HSAs of collectively bargained employees are not subject to the
comparability rules because the comparability rules do not apply to
collectively bargained employees.

    Q-7: Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions only
to the HSAs of comparable participating employees who have coverage
under the employer's HDHP?
    A-7: (a) Employer-provided HDHP coverage. If during a calendar
year, an employer contributes to the HSA of any employee who is an
eligible individual covered under an HDHP provided by the employer, the
employer is required to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees with coverage under any HDHP
provided by the employer. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs
of employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to
HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals but are not covered
under the employer's HDHP.
    (b) Non-employer provided HDHP coverage. An employer that
contributes to the HSA of any employee who is an eligible individual
with coverage under any HDHP that is not an HDHP provided by the
employer, must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all
comparable participating employees whether or not covered under the
employer's HDHP. An employer that makes a reasonable good faith effort
to identify all comparable participating employees with non-employer
provided HDHP coverage and makes comparable contributions to the HSAs
of such employees satisfies the requirements in paragraph (b) of this Q
& A-7.
    (c) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in this Q
& A-7. None of the employees in the following examples are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement. The examples read as follows:

    Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer E offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer E's HDHP and Employer E makes comparable contributions only
to these employees' HSAs. Employee W, a full-time employee of
Employer E and an eligible individual, is covered under an HDHP
provided by the employer of W's spouse and not under Employer E's
HDHP. Employer E is not required to make comparable contributions to
W's HSA.
    Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer F does not offer an
HDHP. Several full-time employees of Employer F, who are eligible
individuals, have HSAs. Employer F contributes to these employees'
HSAs. Employer F must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of
all full-time employees who are eligible individuals.

    Example 3. In a calendar year, Employer G offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer G's HDHP and Employer G makes comparable contributions to
these employees' HSAs and also to the HSAs of full-time employees
who are eligible individuals and who are not covered under Employer
G's HDHP. Employee S, a full-time employee of Employer G and a
comparable participating employee, is covered under an HDHP provided
by the employer of S's spouse and not under Employer G's HDHP.
Employer G must make comparable contributions to S's HSA.

    Q-8: If an employee and his or her spouse are eligible individuals
who work for the same employer and one employee-spouse has family
coverage for both employees under the employer's HDHP, must the
employer make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both employees?
    A-8: (a) In general. If the employer makes contributions only to
the HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals covered under its
HDHP where only one employee-spouse has family coverage for both
employees under the employer's HDHP, the employer is not required to
contribute to the HSAs of both employee-spouses. The employer is
required to contribute to the HSA of the employee-spouse with coverage
under the employer's HDHP, but is not required to contribute to the HSA
of the employee-spouse covered under the employer's HDHP by virtue of
his or her spouse's coverage. However, if the employer contributes to
the HSA of any employee who is an eligible individual with coverage
under an HDHP that is not an HDHP provided by the employer, the
employer must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of both
employee-spouses if they are both eligible individuals. If an employer
is required to contribute to the HSAs of both employee-spouses, the
employer is not required to contribute amounts in excess of the annual
contribution limits in section 223(b).
    (b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-8. None of the employees in the following
examples are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The examples
read as follows:

    Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer H offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer H's HDHP and Employer H makes

[[Page 43062]]

comparable contributions only to these employees' HSAs. T and U are
a married couple. Employee T, who is a full-time employee of
Employer H and an eligible individual, has family coverage under
Employer H's HDHP for T and T's spouse. Employee U, who is also a
full-time employee of Employer H and an eligible individual, does
not have coverage under Employer H's HDHP except as the spouse of
Employee T. Employer H is required to make comparable contributions
to T's HSA, but is not required to make comparable contributions to
U's HSA.
    Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer J offers an HDHP to its
full-time employees. Most full-time employees are covered under
Employer J's HDHP and Employer J makes comparable contributions to
these employees' HSAs and to the HSAs of full-time employees who are
eligible individuals but are not covered under Employer J's HDHP. R
and S are a married couple. Employee S, who is a full-time employee
of Employer J and an eligible individual, has family coverage under
Employer J's HDHP for S and S's spouse. Employee R, who is also a
full-time employee of Employer J and an eligible individual, does
not have coverage under Employer J's HDHP except as the spouse of
Employee S. Employer J must make comparable contributions to S's HSA
and to R's HSA.

    Q-9: Does an employer that makes HSA contributions only for one
class of non-collectively bargained employees who are eligible
individuals, but not for another class of non-collectively bargained
employees who are eligible individuals (for example, management v. non-
management) satisfy the requirement that the employer make comparable
contributions?
    A-9: (a) Different classes of employees.

    No. If the two classes of employees are comparable participating
employees, the comparability rules are not satisfied. The only
categories of employees for comparability purposes are current full-
time employees, current part-time employees, and former employees.
Collectively bargained employees are not comparable participating
employees. But see Q & A-1 in 54.4980G-5 on contributions made through
a cafeteria plan.
    (b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-9. None of the employees in the following
examples are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The examples
read as follows:

    Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer K maintains an HDHP
covering all management and non-management employees. Employer K
contributes to the HSAs of non-management employees who are eligible
individuals covered under its HDHP. Employer K does not contribute
to the HSAs of its management employees who are eligible individuals
covered under its HDHP. The comparability rules are not satisfied.
    Example 2. All of Employer L's employees are located in city X
and city Y. In a calendar year, Employer L maintains an HDHP for all
employees working in city X only. Employer L does not maintain an
HDHP for its employees working in city Y. Employer L contributes
$500 to the HSAs of city X employees who are eligible individuals
with coverage under its HDHP. Employer L does not contribute to the
HSAs of any of its city Y employees. The comparability rules are
satisfied because none of the employees in city Y are covered under
an HDHP of Employer L. (However, if any employees in city Y were
covered by an HDHP of Employer L, Employer L could not fail to
contribute to their HSAs merely because they work in a different
city.)
    Example 3. Employer M has two divisions--division N and division
O. In a calendar year, Employer M maintains an HDHP for employees
working in division N and division O. Employer M contributes to the
HSAs of division N employees who are eligible individuals with
coverage under its HDHP. Employer M does not contribute to the HSAs
of division O employees who are eligible individuals covered under
its HDHP. The comparability rules are not satisfied.
    Q-10: If an employer contributes to the HSAs of former employees
who are eligible individuals, do the comparability rules apply to these
contributions?
    A-10: (a) Former employees. Yes. The comparability rules apply to
contributions an employer makes to former employees' HSAs. Therefore,
if an employer contributes to any former employee's HSA, it must make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all comparable participating
former employees (former employees who are eligible individuals with
the same category of HDHP coverage). However, an employer is not
required to make comparable contributions to the HSAs of former
employees with coverage under the employer's HDHP because of an
election under a COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1)). See Q & A-5 and Q & A-12 of this section. The
comparability rules apply separately to former employees because they
are a separate category of covered employee. See Q & A-5 of this
section. Also, former employees who were covered by a collective
bargaining agreement immediately before termination of employment are
not comparable participating employees. See Q & A-6 of this section.
    (b) Locating former employees. An employer making comparable
contributions to former employees must take reasonable actions to
locate any missing comparable participating former employees. In
general, such actions include the use of certified mail, the Internal
Revenue Service Letter Forwarding Program or the Social Security
Administration's Letter Forwarding Service.
    (c) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-10. None of the employees in the following
examples are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The examples
read as follows:

    Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer N contributes $1,000 for
the calendar year to the HSA of each current employee who is an
eligible individual with coverage under any HDHP. Employer N does
not contribute to the HSA of any former employee who is an eligible
individual. Employer N's contributions satisfy the comparability
rules.
    Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer O contributes to the
HSAs of current employees and former employees who are eligible
individuals covered under any HDHP. Employer O contributes $750 to
the HSA of each current employee with self-only HDHP coverage and
$1,000 to the HSA of each current employee with family HDHP
coverage. Employer O also contributes $300 to the HSA of each former
employee with self-only HDHP coverage and $400 to the HSA of each
former employee with family HDHP coverage. Employer O's
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.

    Q-11: Is an employer permitted to make comparable contributions
only to the HSAs of comparable participating former employees who have
coverage under the employer's HDHP?
    A-11: If during a calendar year, an employer contributes to the HSA
of any former employee who is an eligible individual covered under an
HDHP provided by the employer, the employer is required to make
comparable contributions to the HSAs of all former employees who are
comparable participating former employees with coverage under any HDHP
provided by the employer. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs
of former employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under
the employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to
the HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals and who are
not covered under the employer's HDHP. However, an employer that
contributes to the HSA of any former employee who is an eligible
individual with coverage under an HDHP that is not an HDHP of the
employer, must make comparable contributions to the HSAs of all former
employees who are eligible individuals whether or not covered under an
HDHP of the employer.
    Q-12: If an employer contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP, must the employer make comparable

[[Page 43063]]

contributions to the HSAs of former employees who are eligible
individuals with coverage under the employer's HDHP because of an
election under a COBRA continuation provision (as defined in section
9832(d)(1))?
    A-12: No. An employer that contributes only to the HSAs of former
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under the
employer's HDHP is not required to make comparable contributions to the
HSAs of former employees who are eligible individuals with coverage
under the employer's HDHP because of an election under a COBRA
continuation provision (as defined in section 9832(d)(1)).
    Q-13: How do the comparability rules apply if some employees have
HSAs and other employees have Archer MSAs?
    A-13: (a) HSAs and Archer MSAs. The comparability rules apply
separately to employees who have HSAs and employees who have Archer
MSAs. However, if an employee has both an HSA and an Archer MSA, the
employer may contribute to either the HSA or the Archer MSA, but not to
both.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-13:

    Example. In a calendar year, Employer P contributes $600 to the
Archer MSA of each employee who is an eligible individual and who
has an Archer MSA. Employer P contributes $500 for the calendar year
to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual and who
has an HSA. If an employee has both an Archer MSA and an HSA,
Employer P contributes to the employee's Archer MSA and not to the
employee's HSA. Employee X has an Archer MSA and an HSA. Employer P
contributes $600 for the calendar year to X's Archer MSA but does
not contribute to X's HSA. Employer P's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.


Sec.  54.4980G-4  Calculating comparable contributions.

    Q-1: What are comparable contributions?
    A-1: (a) Definition. Contributions are comparable if, for each
month in a calendar year, the contributions are either the same amount
or the same percentage of the deductible under the HDHP for employees
who are eligible individuals with the same category of coverage on the
first day of that month. Employees with self-only HDHP coverage are
tested separately from employees with family HDHP coverage. Similarly,
employees with different categories of family HDHP coverage may be
tested separately. See Q & A-2 in Sec.  54.4980G-1. An employer is not
required to contribute the same amount or the same percentage of the
deductible for employees who are eligible individuals with one category
of HDHP coverage that it contributes for employees who are eligible
individuals with a different category of HDHP coverage. For example, an
employer that satisfies the comparability rules by contributing the
same amount to the HSAs of all employees who are eligible individuals
with family HDHP coverage is not required to contribute any amount to
the HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals with self-only HDHP
coverage, or to contribute the same percentage of the self-only HDHP
deductible as the amount contributed with respect to family HDHP
coverage. However, the contribution with respect to the self plus two
category may not be less than the contribution with respect to the self
plus one category and the contribution with respect to the self plus
three or more category may not be less than the contribution with
respect to the self plus two category.
    (b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-1. None of the employees in the following
examples are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The examples
read as follows:

    Example 1. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer A offers its
full-time employees three health plans, including an HDHP with self-
only coverage and a $2,000 deductible. Employer A contributes $1,000
for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer A makes no
HSA contributions for employees with family HDHP coverage or for
employees who do not elect the employer's self-only HDHP. Employer
A's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
    Example 2. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer B offers its
employees an HDHP with a $3,000 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $4,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer B contributes
$1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer B
contributes $2,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer B's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
    Example 3. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer C offers its
employees an HDHP with a $1,500 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $3,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer C contributes
$1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer C
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer C's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
    Example 4. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer D offers its
employees an HDHP with a $1,500 deductible for self-only coverage
and a $3,000 deductible for family coverage. Employer D contributes
$1,500 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an
eligible individual electing the self-only HDHP coverage. Employer D
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
who is an eligible individual electing the family HDHP coverage.
Employer D's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
    Example 5. (i) In the 2007 calendar year, Employer E maintains
two HDHPs. Plan A has a $2,000 deductible for self-only coverage and
a $4,000 deductible for family coverage. Plan B has a $2,500
deductible for self-only coverage and a $4,500 deductible for family
coverage. For the calendar year, Employer E makes contributions to
the HSA of each full-time employee who is an eligible individual
covered under Plan A of $600 for self-only coverage and $1,000 for
family coverage. Employer E satisfies the comparability rules, if it
makes either of the following contributions for the 2007 calendar
year to the HSA of each full-time employee who is an eligible
individual covered under Plan B--
    (A) $600 for each full-time employee with self-only coverage and
$1,000 for each full-time employee with family coverage; or
    (B) $750 for each employee with self-only coverage and $1,125
for each employee with family coverage (the same percentage of the
deductible Employer E contributes for full-time employees covered
under Plan A, 30% of the deductible for self-only coverage and 25%
of the deductible for family coverage).
    (ii) Employer E also makes contributions to the HSA of each
part-time employee who is an eligible individual covered under Plan
A of $300 for self-only coverage and $500 for family coverage.
Employer E satisfies the comparability rules, if it makes either of
the following contributions for the 2007 calendar year to the HSA of
each part-time employee who is an eligible individual covered under
Plan B--
    (A) $300 for each part-time employee with self-only coverage and
$500 for each part-time employee with family coverage; or
    (B) $375 for each part-time employee with self-only coverage and
$563 for each part-time employee with family coverage (the same
percentage of the deductible Employer E contributes for part-time
employees covered under Plan A, 15% of the deductible for self-only
coverage and 12.5% of the deductible for family coverage).
    Example 6. (i) In the 2007 calendar year, Employer F maintains
an HDHP. The HDHP has the following coverage options--
    (A) A $2,500 deductible for self-only coverage;
    (B) A $3,500 deductible for self plus one dependent (self plus
one);
    (C) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse (self plus one);
    (D) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse and one dependent
(self plus two); and
    (E) A $3,500 deductible for self plus spouse and two or more
dependents (self plus three or more).
    (ii) Employer F makes the following contributions for the
calendar year to the

[[Page 43064]]

HSA of each full-time employee who is an eligible individual covered
under the HDHP--
    (A) $750 for self-only coverage;
    (B) $1,000 for self plus one dependent;
    (C) $1,000 for self plus spouse;
    (D) $1,500 for self plus spouse and one dependent; and
    (E) $2,000 for self plus spouse and two or more dependents.
    (iii) Employer F's HSA contributions satisfy the comparability
rules.
    Example 7. (i) In a calendar year, Employer G offers its
employees an HDHP and a health flexible spending arrangement (health
FSA). The health FSA reimburses employees for medical expenses as
defined in section 213(d). Some of Employer G's employees have
coverage under the HDHP and the health FSA, some have coverage under
the HDHP and their spouse's FSA, and some have coverage under the
HDHP and are enrolled in Medicare. For the calendar year, Employer G
contributes $500 to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual. No contributions are made to the HSAs of employees who
have coverage under Employer G's health FSA or under a spouse's
health FSA or who are enrolled in Medicare.
    (ii) The employees who have coverage under a health FSA (whether
Employer H's or their spouse's FSA) or who are covered under
Medicare are not eligible individuals. Specifically, the employees
who have coverage under the health FSA or under a spouse's health
FSA are not comparable participating employees because they are not
eligible individuals under section 223(c)(1). Similarly, the
employees who are enrolled in Medicare are not comparable
participating employees because they are not eligible individuals
under section 223(b)(7) and (c)(1). Therefore, employees who have
coverage under the health FSA or under a spouse's health FSA and
employees who are enrolled in Medicare are excluded from
comparability testing. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E. Employer G's
contributions satisfy the comparability rules.

    Q-2: How does an employer comply with the comparability rules when
some non-collectively bargained employees who are eligible individuals
do not work for the employer during the entire calendar year?
    A-2: (a) In general. In determining whether the comparability rules
are satisfied, an employer must take into account all full-time and
part-time employees who were employees and eligible individuals for any
month during the calendar year. (Full-time and part-time employees are
tested separately. See Q & A-5 in Sec.  54.4980G-3.) There are two
methods to comply with the comparability rules when some employees who
are eligible individuals do not work for the employer during the entire
calendar year; contributions may be made on a pay-as-you-go basis or on
a look-back basis. See Q & A-9 through Q & A-11 in Sec.  54.4980G-3 for
the rules regarding comparable contributions to the HSAs of former
employees.
    (b) Contributions on a pay-as-you-go basis. An employer may comply
with the comparability rules by contributing amounts at one or more
dates during the calendar year to the HSAs of employees who are
eligible individuals as of the first day of the month, if contributions
are the same amount or the same percentage of the HDHP deductible for
employees who are eligible individuals as of the first day of the month
with the same category of coverage and are made at the same time.
Contributions made at the employer's usual payroll interval for
different groups of employees are considered to be made at the same
time. For example, if salaried employees are paid monthly and hourly
employees are paid bi-weekly, an employer may contribute to the HSAs of
hourly employees on a bi-weekly basis and to the HSAs of salaried
employees on a monthly basis. An employer may change the amount that it
contributes to the HSAs of employees at any point. However, the changed
contribution amounts must satisfy the comparability rules.
    (c) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (b) of this Q & A-2: The examples read as follows:

    Example 1. (i) Beginning on January 1st, Employer H contributes
$50 per month on the first day of each month to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual on that date. Employer H does
not contribute to the HSAs of former employees. In mid-March of the
same year, Employee X, an eligible individual, terminates employment
after Employer H has contributed $150 to X's HSA. After X terminates
employment, Employer H does not contribute additional amounts to X's
HSA. In mid-April of the same year, Employer H hires Employee Y, an
eligible individual, and contributes $50 to Y's HSA in May and $50
in June. Effective in July of the same year, Employer H stops
contributing to the HSAs of all employees and makes no contributions
to the HSA of any employee for the months of July through December.
In August, Employer H hires Employee Z, an eligible individual.
Employer H does not contribute to Z's HSA. After Z is hired,
Employer H does not hire additional employees. As of the end of the
calendar year, Employer H has made the following HSA contributions
to its employees' HSAs--
    (A) Employer H contributed $150 to X's HSA;
    (B) Employer H contributed $100 to Y's HSA;
    (C) Employer H did not contribute to Z's HSA; and
    (D) Employer H contributed $300 to the HSA of each employee who
was an eligible individual and employed by Employer J from January
through June.
    (ii) Employer H's contributions satisfy the comparability rules.
    Example 2. In a calendar year, Employer J offers its employees
an HDHP and contributes on a monthly pay-as-you-go basis to the HSAs
of employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under
Employer J's HDHP. In the calendar year, Employer J contributes $50
per month to the HSA of each of employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $100 per month to the HSA of each employee with family
HDHP coverage. From January 1st through March 31th of the calendar
year, Employee X is an eligible individual with self-only HDHP
coverage. From April 1st through December 31th of the calendar year,
X is an eligible individual with family HDHP coverage. For the
months of January, February and March of the calendar year, Employer
J contributes $50 per month to X's HSA. For the remaining months of
the calendar year, Employer J contributes $100 per month to X's HSA.
Employer J's contributions to X's HSA satisfy the comparability
rules.

    (d) Contributions on a look-back basis. An employer may also
satisfy the comparability rules by determining comparable contributions
for the calendar year at the end of the calendar year, taking into
account all employees who were eligible individuals for any month
during the calendar year and contributing the same percentage of the
HDHP deductible or the same dollar amount to the HSAs of all employees
with the same category of coverage for that month.
    (e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in
paragraph (d) of this Q & A-2. The examples read as follows:

    Example 1. In a calendar year, Employer K offers its employees
an HDHP and contributes on a look-back basis to the HSAs of
employees who are eligible individuals with coverage under Employer
K's HDHP. Employer K contributes $600 ($50 per month) for the
calendar year to the HSA of each of employee with self-only HDHP
coverage and $1,200 ($100 per month) for the calendar year to the
HSA of each employee with family HDHP coverage. From January 1st
through June 30th of the calendar year, Employee Y is an eligible
individual with family HDHP coverage. From July 1st through December
31, Y is an eligible individual with self-only HDHP coverage.
Employer K contributes $900 on a look-back basis for the calendar
year to Y's HSA ($100 per month for the months of January through
June and $50 per month for the months of July through December).
Employer K's contributions to Y's HSA satisfy the comparability
rules.
    Example 2. On December 31st, Employer L contributes $50 per
month on a look-back basis to each employee's HSA for each month in
the calendar year that the employee was an eligible individual. In
mid-March of the same year, Employee T, an eligible individual,
terminated employment. In mid-April of the same year, Employer L
hired Employee U, who becomes an eligible individual as of May 1st
and works for Employer L through December 31st. On December 31st,
Employer L contributes $150 to Employee T's HSA and $400 to Employee

[[Page 43065]]

U's HSA. Employer L's contributions satisfy the comparability rules.

    (f) Periods and dates for making contributions. With both the pay-
as-you-go method and the look-back method, an employer may establish,
on a reasonable and consistent basis, periods for which contributions
will be made (for example, a quarterly period covering three
consecutive months in a calendar year) and the dates on which such
contributions will be made for that designated period (for example, the
first day of the quarter or the last day of the quarter in the case of
an employer who has established a quarterly period for making
contributions). An employer that makes contributions on a pay-as-you-go
basis for a period covering more than one month will not fail to
satisfy the comparability rules because an employee who terminates
employment prior to the end of the period for which contributions were
made has received more contributions on a monthly basis than employees
who have worked the entire period. In addition, an employer that makes
contributions on a pay-as-you-go basis for a period covering more than
one month must make HSA contributions for any comparable participating
employees hired after the date of initial funding for that period.
    (g) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (f) of this Q & A-2:

    Example. Employer M has established, on a reasonable and
consistent basis, a quarterly period for making contributions to the
HSAs of eligible employees on a pay-as-you-go basis. Beginning on
January 1st, Employer M contributes $150 for the first three months
of the calendar year to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual on that date. On January 15th, Employee V, an eligible
individual, terminated employment after Employer M has contributed
$150 to V's HSA. On January 15th, Employer M hired Employee W, who
becomes an eligible individual as of February 1st. On April 1st,
Employer M has contributed $100 to W's HSA for the two months
(February and March) in the quarter period that Employee W was an
eligible employee. Employer M's contributions satisfy the
comparability rules.

    Q-3: How do the comparability rules apply to employer contributions
to employees' HSAs if some non-collectively bargained employees work
full-time during the entire calendar year, and other non-collectively
bargained employees work full-time for less than the entire calendar
year?
    A-3: Employer contributions to the HSAs of employees who work full-
time for less than twelve months satisfy the comparability rules if the
contribution amount is comparable when determined on a month-to-month
basis. For example, if the employer contributes $240 to the HSA of each
full-time employee who works the entire calendar year, the employer
must contribute $60 to the HSA of each full-time employee who works on
the first day of each three months of the calendar year. The rules set
forth in this Q & A-2 apply to employer contributions made on a pay-as-
you-go basis or on a look-back basis as described in Q & A-3 of this
section. See sections 4980G(b) and 4980E(d)(2)(B).
    Q-4: May an employer make contributions for the entire year to the
HSAs of its employees who are eligible individuals at the beginning of
the calendar year (on a pre-funded basis) instead of contributing on a
pay-as-you-go or on a look-back basis?
    A-4: (a) Contributions on a pre-funded basis. Yes. An employer may
make contributions for the entire year to the HSAs of its employees who
are eligible individuals at the beginning of the calendar year. An
employer that pre-funds the HSAs of its employees will not fail to
satisfy the comparability rules because an employee who terminates
employment prior to the end of the calendar year has received more
contributions on a monthly basis than employees who work the entire
calendar year. See Q & A-12 of this section. Under section
223(d)(1)(E), an account beneficiary's interest in an HSA is
nonforfeitable. An employer must make comparable contributions for all
employees who are comparable participating employees for any month
during the calendar year, including employees who are eligible
individuals hired after the date of initial funding. An employer that
makes HSA contributions on a pre-funded basis may also contribute on a
pre-funded basis to the HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals
hired after the date of initial funding. Alternatively, an employer
that has pre-funded the HSAs of comparable participating employees may
contribute to the HSAs of employees who are eligible individuals hired
after the date of initial funding on a pay-as-you-go basis or on a
look-back basis. An employer that makes HSA contributions on a pre-
funded basis must use the same contribution method for all employees
who are eligible individuals hired after the date of initial funding.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-4:

    Example. (i) On January 1, Employer N contributes $1,200 for the
calendar year on a pre-funded basis to the HSA of each employee who
is an eligible individual. In mid-May, Employer N hires Employee B,
who becomes an eligible individual as of June 1st. Therefore,
Employer N is required to make comparable contributions to B's HSA
beginning in June. Employer N satisfies the comparability rules with
respect to contributions to B's HSA if it makes HSA contributions in
any one of the following ways--
    (A) Pre-funding B's HSA by contributing $700 to B's HSA;
    (B) Contributing $100 per month on a pay-as-you-go basis to B's
HSA; or
    (C) Contributing to B's HSA at the end of the calendar year
taking into account each month that B was an eligible individual and
employed by Employer M.
    (ii) If Employer M hires additional employees who are eligible
individuals after initial funding, it must use the same contribution
method for these employees that it used to contribute to B's HSA.

    Q-5: Must an employer use the same contribution method as described
in Q & A-2 and Q & A-4 of this section for all employees who were
comparable participating employees for any month during the calendar
year?
    A-5: Yes. If an employer makes comparable HSA contributions on a
pay-as-you-go basis, it must do so for each employee who is a
comparable participating employee as of the first day of the month. If
an employer makes comparable contributions on a look-back basis, it
must do so for each employee who was a comparable participating
employee for any month during the calendar year. If an employer makes
HSA contributions on a pre-funded basis, it must do so for all
employees who are comparable participating employees at the beginning
of the calendar year and must make comparable HSA contributions for all
employees who are comparable participating employees for any month
during the calendar year, including employees who are eligible
individuals hired after the date of initial funding. See Q & A-4 of
this section for rules regarding contributions for employees hired
after initial funding.
    Q-6: How does an employer comply with the comparability rules if an
employee has not established an HSA at the time the employer
contributes to its employees' HSAs?
    A-6: (a) Employee has not established an HSA at the time the
employer funds its employees' HSAs. If an employee has not established
an HSA at the time the employer funds its employees' HSAs, the employer
complies with the comparability rules by contributing comparable
amounts plus reasonable interest to the employee's HSA when the
employee establishes the HSA, taking into account each month that the
employee was a comparable participating employee. See Q & A-13 of this
section for rules regarding reasonable interest.

[[Page 43066]]

    (b) Employee has not established an HSA by the end of the calendar
year. [Reserved].
    (c) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-6:

    Example. Beginning on January 1st, Employer O contributes $500
per calendar year on a pay-as-you-go basis to the HSA of each
employee who is an eligible individual. Employee C is an eligible
individual during the entire calendar year but does not establish an
HSA until March. Notwithstanding C's delay in establishing an HSA,
Employer O must make up the missed HSA contributions plus reasonable
interest for January and February by April 15th of the following
calendar year.
    Q-7: If an employer bases its contributions on a percentage of the
HDHP deductible, how is the correct percentage or dollar amount
computed?
    A-7: (a) Computing HSA contributions. The correct percentage is
determined by rounding to the nearest 1/100th of a percentage point and
the dollar amount is determined by rounding to the nearest whole
dollar.
    (b) Example. The following example illustrates the rules in
paragraph (a) of this Q & A-7:

    Example. In this Example, assume that each HDHP provided by
Employer P satisfies the definition of an HDHP for the 2007 calendar
year. In the 2007 calendar year, Employer P maintains two HDHPs.
Plan A has a deductible of $3,000 for self-only coverage. Employer P
contributes $1,000 for the calendar year to the HSA of each employee
covered under Plan A. Plan B has a deductible of $3,500 for self-
only coverage. Employer P satisfies the comparability rules if it
makes either of the following contributions for the 2007 calendar
year to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual with
self-only coverage under Plan B--
    (i) $1,000; or
    (ii) $1,167 (33.33% of the deductible rounded to the nearest
whole dollar amount).

    Q-8: Does an employer that contributes to the HSA of each
comparable participating employee in an amount equal to the employee's
HSA contribution or a percentage of the employee's HSA contribution
(matching contributions) satisfy the rule that all comparable
participating employees receive comparable contributions?
    A-8: No. If all comparable participating employees do not
contribute the same amount to their HSAs and, consequently, do not
receive comparable contributions to their HSAs, the comparability rules
are not satisfied, notwithstanding that the employer offers to make
available the same contribution amount to each comparable participating
employee. But see Q & A-1 in Sec.  54.4980G-5 on contributions to HSAs
made through a cafeteria plan.
    Q-9: If an employer conditions contributions by the employer to an
employee's HSA on an employee's participation in health assessments,
disease management programs or wellness programs and makes the same
contributions available to all employees who participate in the
programs, do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
    A-9: No. If all comparable participating employees do not elect to
participate in all the programs and consequently, all comparable
participating employees do not receive comparable contributions to
their HSAs, the employer contributions fail to satisfy the
comparability rules. But see Q & A-1 in Sec.  54.4980G-5 on
contributions made to HSAs through a cafeteria plan.
    Q-10: If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees who have attained a specified
age or who have worked for the employer for a specified number of
years, do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
    A-10: No. If all comparable participating employees do not meet the
age or length of service requirement, all comparable participating
employees do not receive comparable contributions to their HSAs and the
employer contributions fail to satisfy the comparability rules.
    Q-11: If an employer makes additional contributions to the HSAs of
all comparable participating employees who are eligible to make the
additional contributions (HSA catch-up contributions) under section
223(b)(3), do the contributions satisfy the comparability rules?
    A-11: No. If all comparable participating employees are not
eligible to make the additional HSA contributions under section
223(b)(3), all comparable participating employees do not receive
comparable contributions to their HSAs, and the employer contributions
fail to satisfy the comparability rules.
    Q-12: If an employer's contributions to an employee's HSA result in
non-comparable contributions, may the employer recoup the excess amount
from the employee's HSA?
    A-12: No. An employer may not recoup from an employee's HSA any
portion of the employer's contribution to the employee's HSA. Under
section 223(d)(1)(E), an account beneficiary's interest in an HSA is
nonforfeitable. However, an employer may make additional HSA
contributions to satisfy the comparability rules. An employer may
contribute up until April 15th following the calendar year in which the
non-comparable contributions were made. An employer that makes
additional HSA contributions to correct non-comparable contributions
must also contribute reasonable interest. However, an employer is not
required to contribute amounts in excess of the annual contribution
limits in section 223(b). See Q & A-13 of this section for rules
regarding reasonable interest.
    Q-13: What constitutes a reasonable interest rate for purposes of
making comparable contributions?
    A-13: The determination of whether a rate of interest used by an
employer is reasonable will be based on all of the facts and
circumstances. If an employer calculates interest using the Federal
short-term rate as determined by the Secretary in accordance with
section 1274(d), the employer is deemed to use a reasonable interest
rate.


Sec.  54.4980G-5  HSA comparability rules and cafeteria plans and
waiver of excise tax.

    Q-1: If an employer makes contributions through a section 125
cafeteria plan to the HSA of each employee who is an eligible
individual, are the contributions subject to the comparability rules?
    A-1: (a) In general. No. The comparability rules do not apply to
HSA contributions that an employer makes through a section 125
cafeteria plan. However, contributions to an HSA made through a
cafeteria plan are subject to the section 125 nondiscrimination rules
(eligibility rules, contributions and benefits tests and key employee
concentration tests). See section 125(b), (c) and (g) and the
regulations thereunder.
    (b) Contributions made through a section 125 cafeteria plan.
Employer contributions to employees' HSAs are made through a section
125 cafeteria plan and are subject to the section 125 cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules and not the comparability rules if under the
written cafeteria plan, the employees have the right to elect to
receive cash or other taxable benefits in lieu of all or a portion of
an HSA contribution (meaning that all or a portion of the HSA
contributions are available as pre-tax salary reduction amounts),
regardless of whether an employee actually elects to contribute any
amount to the HSA by salary reduction.
    Q-2: If an employer makes contributions through a cafeteria plan to
the HSA of each employee who is an eligible individual in an amount
equal to the amount of the employee's HSA

[[Page 43067]]

contribution or a percentage of the amount of the employee's HSA
contribution (matching contributions), are the contributions subject to
the section 4980G comparability rules?
    A-2: No. The comparability rules do not apply to HSA contributions
that an employer makes through a section 125 cafeteria plan. Thus,
where matching contributions are made by an employer through a
cafeteria plan, the contributions are not subject to the comparability
rules of section 4980G. However, contributions, including matching
contributions, to an HSA made under a cafeteria plan are subject to the
section 125 nondiscrimination rules (eligibility rules, contributions
and benefits tests and key employee concentration tests). See Q & A-1
of this section.
    Q-3: If under the employer's cafeteria plan, employees who are
eligible individuals and who participate in health assessments, disease
management programs or wellness programs receive an employer
contribution to an HSA and the employees have the right to elect to
make pre-tax salary reduction contributions to their HSAs, are the
contributions subject to the comparability rules?
    A-3: (a) In general. No. The comparability rules do not apply to
employer contributions to an HSA made through a cafeteria plan. See Q &
A-1 of this section.
    (b) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules in this
Sec.  54.4980G-5. The examples read as follows:

    Example 1. Employer A's written cafeteria plan permits employees
to elect to make pre-tax salary reduction contributions to their
HSAs. Employees making this election have the right to receive cash
or other taxable benefits in lieu of their HSA pre-tax contribution.
The section 125 cafeteria plan nondiscrimination rules and not the
comparability rules apply because the HSA contributions are made
through the cafeteria plan.
    Example 2. Employer B's written cafeteria plan permits employees
to elect to make pre-tax salary reduction contributions to their
HSAs. Employees making this election have the right to receive cash
or other taxable benefits in lieu of their HSA pre-tax contribution.
Employer B automatically contributes a non-elective matching
contribution or seed money to the HSA of each employee who makes a
pre-tax HSA contribution. The section 125 cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules and not the comparability rules apply to
Employer B's HSA contributions because the HSA contributions are
made through the cafeteria plan.
    Example 3. Employer C's written cafeteria plan permits employees
to elect to make pre-tax salary reduction contributions to their
HSAs. Employees making this election have the right to receive cash
or other taxable benefits in lieu of their HSA pre-tax contribution.
Employer C makes a non-elective contribution to the HSAs of all
employees who complete a health risk assessment and participate in
Employer C's wellness program. Employees do not have the right to
receive cash or other taxable benefits in lieu of Employer C's non-
elective contribution. The section 125 cafeteria plan
nondiscrimination rules and not the comparability rules apply to
Employer C's HSA contributions because the HSA contributions are
made through the cafeteria plan.
    Example 4. Employer D's written cafeteria plan permits employees
to elect to make pre-tax salary reduction contributions to their
HSAs. Employees making this election have the right to receive cash
or other taxable benefits in lieu of their HSA pre-tax contribution.
Employees participating in the plan who are eligible individuals
receive automatic employer contributions to their HSAs. Employees
make no election with respect to Employer D's contribution and do
not have the right to receive cash or other taxable benefits in lieu
of Employer D's contribution but are permitted to make their own
pre-tax salary reduction contributions to fund their HSAs. The
section 125 cafeteria plan nondiscrimination rules and not the
comparability rules apply to Employer D's HSA contributions because
the HSA contributions are made through the cafeteria plan.

    Q-4: May all or part of the excise tax imposed under section 4980G
be waived?
    A-4: In the case of a failure which is due to reasonable cause and
not to willful neglect, all or a portion of the excise tax imposed
under section 4980G may be waived to the extent that the payment of the
tax would be excessive relative to the failure involved. See sections
4980G(b) and 4980E(c).

    Approved: July 14, 2006.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy).
 [FR Doc. E6-11991 Filed 7-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
© 2024 BenefitsLink.com, Inc.