Guest Campbell Posted September 18, 2001 Report Share Posted September 18, 2001 Our health care plan is a self-funded governmental plan not subject to ERISA. For many years, this plan has enforced a subrogation clause. Anti-subrogation rules apply in our state (NC) but may be preempted by ERISA for self-funded plans. Since we are not an ERISA plan, but are self-funded, can we enforce our subrogation clause? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ralph Amadio Posted September 19, 2001 Report Share Posted September 19, 2001 Can't speak to your state law, however you state that you have a non-subrogation law. We had a somewhat analagous problem in California with self-direction of investments. ERISA provides 404©, governmental plans are not covered by ERISA. We went to the Legislature and were able to obtain a sponsor (now Congressman Gary Miller® of California) for legislation to provide for "mirror language" to ERISA in our California Government Code. The Legislation was passed into law, and we now have fiduciary layoff in California that was not available, and in fact specifically prohibited before the law was passed. I would suggest that you check with your Legislative Counsel in the State Capitol to determine the status of the non subrogation law as it applies to governmental plans. If it does, my guess is that you are stuck with it, unless you can get the law changed relative to governmental plans. Incidentally, if your experience is anything like mine, you will get insurers and other providers that will give you opposite opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now