Guest robertcusick Posted October 16, 2001 Report Share Posted October 16, 2001 A prospective client informed me that the rabbinical council advised him that is was acceptable to take a non-taxable distribution of $15,000 per year from his 403b account for "living expenses." What section of the code or PLR supports this position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol V. Calhoun Posted October 16, 2001 Report Share Posted October 16, 2001 The individual is no doubt referring to the "parsonage allowance" under IRC § 107. There have been some rulings to the effect that if a portion of the distribution (not exceeding actual housing expenses) is specified to be a parsonage allowance, the exclusion may be available under certain circumstances. (I spent some time advising rabbis myself, and was always amused at having to cite a provision for "parsonage allowances" for "ministers of the gospel," but that's life!) Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirk Maldonado Posted October 16, 2001 Report Share Posted October 16, 2001 No more rulings on whether amounts paid from a tax-qualified retirement plan will qualify for the exclusion for parsonage allowance under Section 107. Rev. Proc. 91-3, Section 5.06. Kirk Maldonado Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest newlifeca Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 I have a copy of an IRS document MSSP - "Ministers" - it's a training document for IRS employees. In it is the statement "A retired minister may recieve part of his or her pension benefits as a designated parsonage allowance" it then refers to IRS ruling 75-22. While this MSSP document is not a legal opinion, it may provide a starting point. Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol V. Calhoun Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 There was an earlier, and quite detailed, discussion of this issue on the Church Plans message board. You can get to it by clicking on this link: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=2055 Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest robertcusick Posted October 17, 2001 Report Share Posted October 17, 2001 From the replies (and thanks to all who replied), I see that the IRS is "accepting" of the practice without actually having ruled on the subject. This brings me to more questions, namely: - does the rabbi/minister have to be active. or can he/she be retired and still claim the allowance? - is it safe to assume costs including rent/mortgage, utilities, maintenance etc., are attributable to "housing expenses"? - what "certain circumstances" is Carol V. Calhoun referring to? (I love that phrase) - can the exclusion be applied to distributions from an IRA rollover account (from the taxpayer's 403b plan), or must the distribution be from the original plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest newlifeca Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 I answer to three your questions 1) It is my understanding that is definately for a retired rabbi, here is some wording from a IRS document for field workers dealing with ministers "A retired minister may receive part of his or her pension benefits as a designated parsonage allowance based on past services. If so, the "least of" rules apply.8 Trustees of a minister’s retirement plan may designate a portion of each pension distribution as a parsonage allowance excludable under IRC section 107. The minister may claim that the amount is both excludable from income as a parsonage allowance under IRC section 107 and excludable from self-employment income for Self-Employment Contribution Act (SECA) purposes." 2) Allowable expenses are outlined in IRS publication 517 Hope this helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim Andrews Posted November 16, 2001 Report Share Posted November 16, 2001 Does anyone know if there are any restrictions on the housing allowance if a 1035 annuity exchange is done within a 403b? I am being told that it will not be allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim Andrews Posted November 16, 2001 Report Share Posted November 16, 2001 Let me restate that. The housing allowence will not be allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carol V. Calhoun Posted November 28, 2001 Report Share Posted November 28, 2001 This is probably the correct interpretation, at least if the new annuity is not one available under the original plan. The existing authorities that have allowed a housing allowance in the context of a 403(B) plan have relied on some action taken by the plan sponsor. If the retiree is dealing directly with a provider without plan sponsor involvement, it would be harder to make the claim that a nontaxable housing allowance was available. Employee benefits legal resource site The opinions of my postings are my own and do not necessarily represent my law firm's position, strategies, or opinions. The contents of my postings are offered for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. A visit to this board or an exchange of information through this board does not create an attorney-client relationship. You should consult directly with an attorney for individual advice regarding your particular situation. I am not your lawyer under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now