Archimage Posted March 28, 2002 Share Posted March 28, 2002 I have recently started to use fool around with the testing components of Relius. Can you make Relius exclude participants that have not met the 1 year/ age 21 eligibility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmacduff Posted March 28, 2002 Share Posted March 28, 2002 Yes - there is an option right on the ADP/ACP test menu - "statutory exclusions" which, if you check, will exclude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archimage Posted March 28, 2002 Author Share Posted March 28, 2002 Okay, thanks for the help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tbrown Posted April 4, 2002 Share Posted April 4, 2002 This does work to some extent. However, the problem lies in if you have people who are participants but never met the statuatory requirements. According to the regs, you can continue to exclude someone year after year if, for example, they only work 500 hours per year but are eligible to defer. I have discussed this with their support department and they agree that it is not doing it properly. An enhancement request is in, but I'm not sure how soon, or if, we will see that change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DottleC2 Posted April 5, 2002 Share Posted April 5, 2002 There were some issues with the calculation of the booster when using stat exclusions, also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Poje Posted April 8, 2002 Share Posted April 8, 2002 remember the following: if you use otherwise excludable option, you also need to run your coverage in the same manner. census element statutory exclusion can be used to override forever part time employees. hopefully its not many people. there are no clear guidelines on what constitutes the 'otherwise excludable group' Relius uses 1st day of plan year or 6 months after 1 year of service. others would argue you also have to consider plan's entry dates. I have even found one comment, supposedly from the person involved in the original regs things should be treated as if there are two entry dates (e.g. 1/1 and 7/1.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now