Guest thill Posted November 29, 2006 Share Posted November 29, 2006 hi everyone. just as a way of background, i work for a TPA that specializes in 457(e)(11) plans for volunteer firefighters. i have a math degree and have been mainly involved in the record keeping aspects but am getting more and more involved in the trust arrangements and the ideas of "trustee" and "custodian". i don't have any formal schooling on these topics so i was wondering if i could be pointed to a site or information on what the technical/legal difference is between a custodian and trustee, as the terms seem to be used interchangeably but i'm sure they shouldn’t be. thanks--hope i'm posting this in the right forum........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leopurrd Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 in a nutshell... Custodian means they only hold the funds. Trustee means they are taking a fiduciary responsibility regarding the plan. you may want to see if your firm has a Pension Answer book or ERISA Outline book. See the definition of trustee or fiduciary. Either way (custodian/trustee) there should be some sort of agreement between the plan sponsor and custodian/trustee on their duties (hopefully!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpod Posted November 30, 2006 Share Posted November 30, 2006 A trust is a separate legal entity, separate from the beneficiary(ies). The trustee is the "legal" owner of the assets held in the trust and the beneficiary(ies) is(are) the beneficial owner(s). A custodial account is simply a contractual relationship whereby one person - the custodian - holds assets which are legally and beneficially owned by another person; the custodial account is not a separate entity. Of course, in the world of qualified plans and IRAs this distinction is largely meaningless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest thill Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 THANKS! that was very helpful. these are sponsored by local governments and based on our interpretation of state law, it was always our interpretation that the local government should be the trustee because they are the legal owners of the assets of these programs (part of which makes them tax defered to participants). we want to have these plans be funded and therefore have been set up with rabbi trusts, but we have been told by one attorney that in a rabbi trust the trustee must be a corporate trustee--it can't be the municipality (or the individuals making up the board). our firm and the clients do have documentation but i am trying to understand it for myself so i can have a better handle on what we do. and these are non-qualified plans, so i don't know how that adds to the equation. thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locust Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 You might want to look at Code ss 457(g). A rabbi trust does not work for a plan maintained by an "eligible employer" - that is a governmental employer. The assets must be separated from the government (that is they can't be owned by the government) and held by a trust or a particular type of custodial agreement "for the exclusive benefit of participants and their beneficiaries." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Locust Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 Oops - sorry I see that you are talking about 457(e)(11) plans, which are not deferred compensation plans subject to ss 457(g). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John G Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 If you are doing this work as a volunteer for a not-for-profit organization, you may want to see if your local bar association can refer you to a lawyer who may be consulted. Due to a recent death in the family, I found myself in the roles of custodian, trustee, and executor. I spent many hours googling, reading books and talking with lawyers (hired three in different states for different functions, interviewed eight). I thought I started from a pretty good baseline of knowledge and discovered I needed to know a lot more. One additional complication - the states of VT, PA, FL, and CO all come into play. I learned that PA is perhaps the most complicate state in which to die! And five copies of a will do not make one original...never lose the original will! Good luck with your work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now