Guest IRISH79 Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 Can a church plan pay lump sum based on its actuarial assumptions and not use GATT Rate as a minimum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 Non-electing church plans are not subject to IRC Section 417. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david rigby Posted January 23, 2007 Report Share Posted January 23, 2007 .... subject to the terms of the plan itself. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Danny Miller Posted January 24, 2007 Report Share Posted January 24, 2007 Can a church plan pay lump sum based on its actuarial assumptions and not use GATT Rate as a minimum? Church plans are also not subject to the anti-cutback rule in Code section 411(d) which also relates to your question. But, pax is right: if the terms of the plan call for the GATT rate to be used, then failure to use that rate could result in a contract claim by disadvantaged participants that their "contract" with the employer (the terms of the retirement plan) had been breached. That failure would also be a failure to follow the terms of the plan document. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now