Jump to content

Health and Welfare Plan Deductions


Recommended Posts

A one person C corporation has a H&W plan.

The deductible limit under 419A for additions to accounts is computed to be $20,000.

The owner contributes $10,000 to the plan, thus it would be fully deductible.

The plan has income of $5,000 for the plan year.

So at the end of the plan year the plan has total assets of $15,000.

Is the $5,000 of investment income taxable to the corporation? Or since the total contributions and investment return is less than the 20k deductible limit, is none of the income taxable?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize that I am out of my league here posting on an H&W site, being that I am a pension actuary.

If anyone knows of some useful and practical resource for a basic understanding of H&W plans, please advise.

The resources that I have had, simply include IRC 419, which as I understand it, sets forth (in part) deduction limits to single employer H&W plans.

Unfortunately, I was thrown into a little bit of H&W work at the small firm I work at.

With that said, I am not sure why the contribution by said C Corporation to a H&W plan trust would not be deductible if it is for a reserve for post retirement medical expenses and the amount contributed is less than the limit under 419?

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary posted: "If anyone knows of some useful and practical resource for a basic understanding of H&W plans, please advise."

I responded: "The Employee Benefits Answer Book (a sister to the Pension Answer Book and the 401(k) Answer Book) is a good reference work. I also like Tax Facts."

No theory was referenced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don

The cost is simply the time and effort to go back and read the posts.

It was a simple response to a simple question. Those are the 2 resources that he advises to be used for a basic understanding of H&W plans.

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George:

You are partially correct.

In addition, Gary asked "I am not sure why the contribution to a H&W plan trust would not be deductible if it is for a resrerve for post retirement medical expenses and the amount contributed is less than the amount under 419?

Vebaguru did not address that question.

I assumed he wanted Gary to look through those 2 sources for an answer.

By the way, I can't remember one time in which you and vebaguru did not support each other's answers.

How do you know what vebaguru meant... unless...

No, that can't be true.

Don Levit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is an old adage that states that great minds often think alike ..... etc. I will leave it to others to decide which is applicable.

I really do not know what vebaguru meant but I am able to read the posts in the thread and decide what it is he was responding to initially. He then confirmed and clarified in his subsequent post making it unnecessary for me to make assumptions.

Gary separated the items in his post with "With that said ..." clearly separating the question to which vebaguru answered. The 419 question has nothing to do with the resources question.

I was not trying to speak for vebaguru as much as I was trying to avoid you creating more confusion.

I look at a Forum as a group of people sitting around a large table discussing an issue. If one person tries to dominate, mislead, or change the topic, it is allowed that any other participant can ntervene, raise an objection or point out the "error"/variance/transgression.

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have the remaining questions below:

I am not sure why the contribution by said C Corporation to a H&W plan trust would not be deductible if it is for a reserve for post retirement medical expenses and the amount contributed is less than the limit under 419?

I am also interested in knowing if the contribution plus investment income add up to be less than the deduction limit, could the investment income not be taxable? Or is the investment income still taxable?

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary

In post #1 you said that the owner contributed $10,000 to the plan, now you talk about contribution by the corporation. Which is it ?

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a one person C corporation. The one person owns the C corporation. He is the owner and the only employee.

Don, I am a little surprised that the investment income is income tax free. That is, people say that they use insurance contracts to avoid taxation on income build up and others suggested the creation of a VEBA (though as you say that doesn't work for a one person plan) to avoid taxation on investment income. That is, people say that the income in a H&W trust that is not invested in insurance and is not a VEBA is taxable.

I thought that maybe if the contribution plus income were still less than the deduction limit than the income in that case would not be taxed. And if the contribution were equal to the deduction limit, than additional income would be taxable.

Perhaps you can clarify what you said as compared to my alleged perception of how it might work in the paragraph immediately above.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary:

If the deductible limit was properly calculated under 419A, then any growth in the amounts set aside is tax-free if used to pay post-retirement medical benefits.

Any amounts remaining at the owner's death, as well as his dependents, must be forfeited, however.

Don Levit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I missed this earlier:

By the way, I can't remember one time in which you and vebaguru did not support each other's answers.

I hadn't noticed it before, but GBurns must be a genius. He is in Pembroke Pines, FL. I am in UT and have never heard of Pembroke Pines, FL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gary:

If the deductible limit was properly calculated under 419A, then any growth in the amounts set aside is tax-free if used to pay post-retirement medical benefits.

Any amounts remaining at the owner's death, as well as his dependents, must be forfeited, however.

Don Levit

The deductible limit is defined in 419. 419A defines qualified additions to a qualified asset account. Deductibility under 419 in no way assures that growth on medical set asides are tax-free. In fact a simple review of form 1041 and the instructions thereunder shows that the trust is taxed on realized income.

Amounts remaining on the death of a participant may be used by the participant's dependents during their lifetimes but will be forfeited if not utilized before the death of the last of the participant's dependents.

Other than those differences, I agree with Don Levit's assertions. Sometimes I wonder if Don posts outrageous stuff just to get a reaction from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vebaguru:

I could not find in form 1041 where interest on the medical income from a proper set aside is taxable.

Can you provide the specific parts of the form and the instructions which discuss this?

Do you agree that exempt function income of a VEBA is not taxable, either through income taxes or UBTI?

Referring to TAM 199932050 it states regarding the taxation of income from a set aside which abides by the 419 limit ""Section 1.512(a)-5T, Q&A-4(a) states that Code section 512(a)(3)(E)(ii)(I) provides that income that is either directly or indirectly attributable to the reserve in section 512 will not be treated as UBTI. Because earnings of the existing reserve are directly attributable to the existing reserve, such earnings shall not be treated as UBTI. Furthermore, earnings on such earnings are indirectly attributable to the existing reserve and also should not be treated as UBTI."

So, where is the taxation of the earnings of a properly set aside reserve, either through income taxes or UBTI?

Don Levit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Yes, I agree that exempt function income is not taxable. That was the exact issue in the Sherwin Williams, where IRS won, was reversed on appeal and has announced their intention not to accept the Court of Appeals decision as binding on them in the other 10 circuits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...