ubermax

Asset Smoothing

7 posts in this topic

The description of asset smoothing in the proposed 430 regs seems to mimic Approval 11 of Rev.Proc. 2000-40 (i.e. average value without phase-in).

H.R. 7327 (WRERA) seems to amend the proposed reg by introducing expected earnings into the mix using a rate no greater than the applicable segment 3 rate.

Algebraically do we end up with one of the smoothing methods in 2000-40 or is it new and to be described in forthcoming guidance ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IRS guidance is likely, and needed. IMHO, it would be reasonable, at least in the meantime, to look to Rev.Proc. 2000-40 for expected smoothing structure; just can't go to five years anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And question is which 3rd segment rate are they talking about. For example, suppose it's 2010. Do you simply apply 2010 3rd segment rate retroactively or do you employ 2008 rate for 2008 and 2009 rate for 2009?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The description of asset smoothing in the proposed 430 regs seems to mimic Approval 11 of Rev.Proc. 2000-40 (i.e. average value without phase-in).

H.R. 7327 (WRERA) seems to amend the proposed reg by introducing expected earnings into the mix using a rate no greater than the applicable segment 3 rate.

Algebraically do we end up with one of the smoothing methods in 2000-40 or is it new and to be described in forthcoming guidance ?

Should the expected earnings be based on a short term assumption or long term assumption?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Should the expected earnings be based on a short term assumption or long term assumption?

I'm not sure what you mean? As Andy points out, it appears the maximum assumed earnings rate (for purposes of smoothing) is the third segment of the funding rates (Sec. 121(a) of WRERA).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Should the expected earnings be based on a short term assumption or long term assumption?

I'm not sure what you mean? As Andy points out, it appears the maximum assumed earnings rate (for purposes of smoothing) is the third segment of the funding rates (Sec. 121(a) of WRERA).

I agree that the MAXIMUM assumed earnings rate is the third segment of the funding rates. However, that doesn't necessarily mean that rate will be the assumed earnings rate. For example, if a plan has most or all of its money invested in a money market, or similar account, the assumed earnings rate would not necessarily be as high as 6.43% (Jan 2008). While the current money market rate may be only 1.5%, over the long term, maybe 4% is a reasonable expected rate of return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now