Jump to content

Employer Endorsement


Guest tm3333

Recommended Posts

Guest tm3333

Will allowing non-employer sponsored insurance to be paid pre-tax via a premium only plan constitute endorsement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Danger, Will Robinson, danger!

Permitting participants to pay for voluntary benefits on a pre-tax basis through a cafeteria plan is a strong indicator of employer "endorsement" for purposes of determining whether an ERISA plan exists. It's not definitive and depend on other circumstances, but I would not attempt it without having a short conversation with your counsel. There are unfavorable consequences if ERISA does end up applying to these benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is too easy to inadvertently endorse or to imply endorsement, to be worth the risk.

George D. Burns

Cost Reduction Strategies

Burns and Associates, Inc

www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction)

www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tm3333

Thank you for the input. That is what I suspected. Are you aware of any IRS or DOL guidance that addresses this issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the input. That is what I suspected. Are you aware of any IRS or DOL guidance that addresses this issue?

DOL Reg. 2510.3-1 contains the safe harbor for voluntary plans.

There are a lot of cases that look at what is employer "endorsement" including some that address including the program in a cafeteria plan. There is also a lot of DOL advisory opinions on employee endorsement although I cannot recall anyone that specifically looked at the cafeteria plan angle. I'm not aware of any IRS guidance except to state what benefits can be offered in a cafeteria plan, but I don't think this is an area where they would get involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am confused by the angst over this. This is what the pertinent portion of the regulation says:

(3) The sole functions of the employer or employee organization with respect to the program are, without endorsing the program, to permit the insurer to publicize the program to employees or members, to collect premiums through payroll deductions or dues checkoffs and to remit them to the insurer; and

It sounds like the only thing the employer is doing is delivering payroll deduction amounts. Separately, it is doing it under a cafeteria plan to enable employees to save taxes. We all know that the DOL takes the position that employee money is employee money even though it may be fictionally treated as "employer money" for certain purposes under the IRC and IRC regulations. This is not to say that there isn't an endorsement going on here for other reasons, but not because of the facilitation of premium payments via payroll deduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am confused by the angst over this. This is what the pertinent portion of the regulation says:

(3) The sole functions of the employer or employee organization with respect to the program are, without endorsing the program, to permit the insurer to publicize the program to employees or members, to collect premiums through payroll deductions or dues checkoffs and to remit them to the insurer; and

It sounds like the only thing the employer is doing is delivering payroll deduction amounts. Separately, it is doing it under a cafeteria plan to enable employees to save taxes. We all know that the DOL takes the position that employee money is employee money even though it may be fictionally treated as "employer money" for certain purposes under the IRC and IRC regulations. This is not to say that there isn't an endorsement going on here for other reasons, but not because of the facilitation of premium payments via payroll deduction.

I don't necessarily disagree with you but there has been at least one court that does. If I recall, one of the reasons running a voluntary program through a cafeteria plan is problematic is that the tax savings enjoyed by both the employer and employee tie the program to the employment relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

It sounds like if a voluntary plan is run through the cafeteria plan, it is a form of an endorsement and therefore an ERISA plan.

Consider a plan that is not part of the cafeteria plan. It was formerly paid by the employer which transitioned to completely voluntary in 2010. Since then they have continued to file Form 5500 with the same plan number, as well as maintain the same plan name (including plan sponsor name) on employee handouts. They will therefore be filing 5500 through 2012. Can they transition effective 2013 to a non-ERISA plan that no longer files Form 5500 if they change the plan name and no longer endorse it, thereby falling into the Safe Harbor discussed in the links above? If so, can they go so far as checking off Final Form for 2012?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just rephrasing prior question.

ERISA Plan transitions to fully voluntary, not run through cafeteria plan, post tax payments made through payroll. Can this plan simply stop filing 5500?

The closest thing we have found to a company endorsement is that the enrollment form says the company name. Is that right there enough to disqualify plan from safe harbor, thereby requiring 5500 filing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...