Belgarath Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 I have so little contact with Governmental Plans that I'm unsure of what I think I know. I have very little information to go on here, other than a brief conversation. The new director of a governmental entity, which has a 457 plan and a 401(a) profit sharing plan, wants to make elective deferrals to the profit sharing plan. He said his prior governmental employer allowed him to do this. That's the sum of the information I have at this point. His prior plan may possibly have been a grandfathered 401(k) plan. Let's assume that the current 401(a) plan is post-TRA 86 and is not a "grandfathered" 401(k) plan. I think the current plan could allow employee voluntary after-tax contributions, and that these would count against the 415 limit. I think the current plan canot allow "deferrals" in the normal sense. I think a governmental plan may provide for mandatory employee contributions, and "pick up" the mandatory contribution under 414(h). Agree/disagree? Is there any basis for allowing "deferrals to a governmental 401(a) plan, including a money purchase plan, other than as I mentioned above? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FormsRstillmylife Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 I agree, generally. Voluntary and mandatory contributions are annual additions as under a defined contribution plan; thus, they are not a 415 problem for a defined benefit plan. Mandatory contributions could be sticky depending upon the sort of government plan you are working with. Government employees often have contractual rights to a retirement plan. If the contract did not say mandatory contributions, they are not happening. Voluntary is the real option, but he will not like the after-tax treatment. You could also explore 457(b), not as secure for the employee, but perhaps more desirable for the employer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QDROphile Posted August 23, 2012 Report Share Posted August 23, 2012 457(b) plans for governement employers are not subject to claims of creditors, which is the "insecurity" for 457(b) plan of non-governmental employers. For all governmental plans, the government must have stautory authority to maintain the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now