Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
david rigby

Lump Sums: GATT vs. PBGC basis

Recommended Posts

Can I amend a DB plan definition of Actuarial Equivalent (for purposes of lump sum calcs only) by using the LESSER of:

the old 417(3) basis, or

the new 417(e) bais, such that the latter becomes the only definition when the transition period expires?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Keith N

I assume you mean 417(e) not 417(3), but that being said, as long as you are providing a lump sum at least as large as the one produced using the "new 417(e)" rate structure you should be ok. Remember, this is only a minimum, you can always pay a larger lump if you want (assuming you don't violate 415) I would watch out for other existing minimum lump sums. For example if you plan states 5.5% but not less than the 417(e) rate, then your still stuck with the 5.5%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Harry O

I'm not sure what you mean. Once you amend your plan to adopt the GATT rules, this becomes the minimum lump sum required by law. Thus, if the "old" PBGC based lump sum is lower than the "new" GATT lump sum, you must pay the GATT benefit. Your minimum lump sum can't be the lower of the the old PBGC based lump sum or the new GATT lump sum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...