MarZDoates Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Since SIMPLE plans are subject to the controlled group rules (i.e. all members of the controlled group are treated as a single employer for qualified plan requirements), would it be correct to say that there can not be a SIMPLE sponsored by one controlled group member and a 401(k) sponsored by the other controlled group member in the same year? Thanks. QPA, QKA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flyboyjohn Posted August 13, 2013 Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Correct except for the year that the previously unrelated employers became part of a controlled group Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarZDoates Posted August 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 Thank you. QPA, QKA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgarath Posted August 14, 2013 Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 Actually, expanding upon previous comment, I believe the 410(b)(6)© transition period covers both the initial year AND the following year. So if the previously unrelated employers become a controlled group due to a 410(b)(6)© transaction in 2013, then you are potentially ok for 2013 and for 2014. Well, darn this autocorrect - it keeps changing the "C" that is supposed to be in parentheses. Can't seem to get it to work correctly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Poje Posted August 14, 2013 Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 I don't do SIMPLEs, but the question peeked my interest. Suppose Company A sponsors the SIMPLE for members of Company A and Company B sponsors a 401(k) for company B members only. 1.401(k)-4©(1) says the SIMPLE must be the exclusive plan for each SIMPLE 401(k) plan participant ...under any other qualified plan maintained by the employer so I don't think having a controlled group necessarily negates the ability to have a SIMPLE. In fact, the mere statement saying 'under any other plan maintained by the employer' implies you could have other plans. (it might show a bit of insanity on the company's part, but that is another issue) The coverage rules might cause the plan to fail. Certainly if the controlled group is above 100 employees you can't do it (1.401(k)-4(b)(1) 1.401(k)-4(b)(2) then says you have the 2 year rule to fix the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgarath Posted August 14, 2013 Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 FWIW, my comments were based upon the SIMPLE being a SIMPLE-IRA rather than a SIMPLE 401(k). It never occurred to me that the SIMPLE might be a SIMPLE(k). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Poje Posted August 14, 2013 Report Share Posted August 14, 2013 fair is fair, I never even thought about a SIMPLE IRA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anspai Posted December 14, 2016 Report Share Posted December 14, 2016 Per this discussion, what if Company A sponsors a Simple and Company B sponsors a QACA. In mid plan year (3/2017) Company A acquires Company B (stock purchase) can Company A terminate or freeze the simple and take sponsorship of Company B's QACA plan, or would they need to run separate plans until 12/31/2017? Additional info: At time of merger the total eligible participants would then exceed the allowable number of eligible employees for a Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now