Fisher 0 Report post Posted April 24, 2014 Can someone provide me the reasons why a Gov't Hospital would not choose to file or act as a 501©(3) organization besides not having to comply with the new Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA). What reasons prior to CHNA would they have had besides possible UBIT. And if they did choose to act as one, other than wanting to have a 403(b) plans, what requirements would be needed to continue to act as a 501©(3) organization. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
My 2 cents 248 Report post Posted April 24, 2014 Not speaking as an expert here. It is my understanding that 501©(3) organizations generally have to comply with ERISA and plans sponsored by governmental entities don't. Isn't it essentially automatic that governmental entities are exempt from federal taxation? Why would they want to confuse things by self-identifying as any sort of non-profit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ebplans 0 Report post Posted January 30 Don't know if you ever got closure on this issue. Governmental hospitals can get 501(c)(3) status. With that accomplished, they can maintain a TDA/403(b) plan as well as a 457(b) plan. The cost of getting and maintaining 501(c) status is compliance with 501(r). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Carol V. Calhoun 31 Report post Posted March 31 The other "cost" of being a 501(c)(3) is that some very old GCMs say that a governmental entity that obtains 501(c)(3) status becomes subject to UBIT. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
