Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dv13

409A Change in Control loophole?

Recommended Posts

Plan only provides for one of the 409A CIC options: a "change in ownership of a substantial portion of corporate assets." Under the Regs this means the date on which a person or group of people acquires (or has acquired during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by that person or group of people) assets from the corporation that have a total gross FMV equal to or more than 40% of the total gross FMV of all assets of the corporation immediately before such acquisition.

Under the terms of their plan, CIC accelerates vesting and is also a payment trigger.

A 58% owner wants to leave the company in 2 years and have the other owners absorb his 58%. If the 58% owner transferred half (29%) in one 12-month period and the remaining half (29%) in the subsequent 12-month period, does it circumvent the CIC trigger? Company does not want the transfer from the 58% owner to trigger a CIC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with QDROphile. If the plan only provides a CIC payment trigger on a sale of assets, the transfer of stock among existing shareholders will not trigger a CIC. The 409A rules provide permissible CIC definitions, not mandatory ones. If the plan hasn't opted to use the change in stock ownership rules, they won't apply.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see what you're saying. My confusion hinged on my considering the shares to be assets. Thanks for the replies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...