Young Curmudgeon Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 How aggressive is it if I set forward the testing table (software allows up to 9 years) for my combined plan testing? Without a set forward, the gateway requirement jumps to 7%. With a five year set forward, I'm back to 6%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
My 2 cents Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Never mind what the software allows - what do the applicable regulations allow? Always check with your actuary first! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Curmudgeon Posted February 5, 2016 Author Share Posted February 5, 2016 Yes, that is the question. It is the same table for everyone with the set forward. I have opposing views from two actuaries. Is there anything that can be relied on in the regs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Preston Posted February 5, 2016 Share Posted February 5, 2016 Which is to say, they don't. I'd ask the actuary that said you could use a set forward to provide a cite. My guess is that the software allows a set forward "just in case" the regs are changed to so allow someday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now