david rigby Posted September 29, 2016 Share Posted September 29, 2016 https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-16-51.pdf I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griswold Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 never a dull moment! CMarkB 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatherBeGolfing Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 So much for a relaxing weekend... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG5150 Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 Anything major? I, too, will be perusing it this weekend, but was jsut wondering. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgarath Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 I did nothing more than speed read the section in the beginning where it lists the changes, and it didn't appear to be much of a change. Largely just incorporating prior changes, modifications due to the determination letter program changing, some minor clarifications, moving stuff from one section to another, modifying the Appendix C Schedules, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Poje Posted September 30, 2016 Share Posted September 30, 2016 same as Belgarath, simply looked at the changes, though I did look at Appendix B, plan amendment to include ineligible, and the example still says submit for determination letter. everywhere else they seem to say don't do this so I wonder if they simply missed on this item of course, I guess anything is EPCRS including examples is 'definitely ok' and if you don't submit for a letter you are 'possibly taking your chances' but in light of the fact the IRS has practically begged you not to submit.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EBECatty Posted October 1, 2016 Share Posted October 1, 2016 The new Rev. Proc. eliminated the 50% refund for anonymous submissions failing to reach resolution, which I use on occasion. Always thought this was a good feature in iffy cases, so that's unfortunate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now