Jump to content

Top Heavy Fix Basics


rushlakeguy

Recommended Posts

I've run into an unfortunately situation for my company.  I own a hair salon (50/50 partner) with another individual.  We use Paychex to administer our 401k plan and was just informed that we are Top Heavy as of 12/31/2015 (60.7%) and owe $49k. This is a horrible as there are less than $100k of assets in the plan. I'm beyond frustrated as I was told back in spring that we were in compliance and now they are being entirely unhelpful in answering my questions, so I'm hoping someone here can help.

It's a basic deferral plan.  I've never made an employer contribution.

Questions:

1)  They are calculating the TH penalty contribution as being 3% of compensation for every employee who was employed in 2016.  Is this correct, or should it only be employees eligible to the plan (6 months of service and over 21 years old) as of 12/31/2015?

2) what happens if an employee is terminated during 2016?  any impact?

3) Myself and the other owner only made 1% contributions during 2016.  I've heard I may be able to make a 1% contribution, rather than 3% for all employees.  Is that true?

4) Is the vesting for the 3% contribution immediate?

Thank you so much.  I can't wait to get this behind me and replace Paychex as a provider. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you and the other owner only make 1% contributions, then you should be okay making only the 1% contribution for the "non-keys" -- UNLESS, you have other employees in the Plan that are considered "key employees" (not likely is my guess) and they made 401(k) deferrals of more than 1%.

Other possible way to get out of this: Lean on Paychex to refund to you and the other owner the 1% contributions you made during 2016. In other words, undo your 401(k) contribution.  If you and the other owner don't contribute to the plan for 2016, then you don't have to make the TH minimum contribution.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that some of the large 401(k) providers are compartmentalized to the point that there are a number of issues that don't get addressed until the plan sponsor has very few options.

Nobody can answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

However, with that said the answers are:

1) It is probably not everybody,  it is not even necessarily employees "eligible to the plan (6 months of service and over 21 years old) as of 12/31/2015" because not only do they need to satisfy the eligibility criteria they need to also satisfy the entry date criteria. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

2) Typically, top-heavy minimum contributions are not required for participants who have terminated before the end of the year. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

3) Typically, if the highest deferral rate for any key employee is 1% then the top-heavy minimum is also reduced to 1% from 3%.  Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

4) Typically, the top-heavy minimum allocation will be subject to a six year graded vesting schedule (0-20-40-60-80-100). Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

See a pattern? Straight out of the department of redundancy department: Nobody can definitively answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

I would not "lean on" any service provider to commit fraud.  Unless somebody thinks they can get the IRS to allow you and your partner's deferrals to be retroactively re-characterized, I would stay away from any manner of pretense.

You need to hire a competent service provider to review the actual plan document and the actual history of the plan.  Frankly, the first thing I'd take a look at is that 60.7% figure and make doubly sure that is being calculated correctly.  If that number falls to less than 60% it renders the rest of this discussion moot.

And while it is too late to do much for 2016, until this issue gets resolved you should take steps to eliminate any deferrals by any key employee for 2017 (probably just you and your partner).

Good luck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it is "fraud" if they undo their 401(k) contributions based on mistake. The owners re-do their W-2s and include the returned 401(k) contributions (adjusted for earnings) in their taxable income for 2016. I don't think that is "fraud". I think it's a practical solution to a problem that comes up more often than it should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Mike correctly states the answers to your questions should all be in the Plan Document.

While the determination date for 2016 is 12/31/2015, eligible non-key employees in 2016 would get the TH minimum based on full year 2016 pay, even if your document excludes pre-participation compensation.

If your plan document is drafted such that only non-key employee/participants who are employed on the last day of the year are eligible for the TH minimum then you can satisfy the TH-minimum with a 1% contribution (assuming that is the highest deferral rate between you and your partner) just to them.

 

On the other hand if it says all employees even Key get the TH minimum once you and partner get the 1% contribution your are now at 2% with deferral and have to increase to 2% which starts the whole cycle over.

 

But I totally agree with Mike, have that 60.7% figure rechecked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JRN said:

I don't think it is "fraud" if they undo their 401(k) contributions based on mistake. The owners re-do their W-2s and include the returned 401(k) contributions (adjusted for earnings) in their taxable income for 2016. I don't think that is "fraud". I think it's a practical solution to a problem that comes up more often than it should.

While I agree with your practicality. I believe the IRS from the podium at conferences agrees with Mike's comment that you can't simply "reverse the key-ee deferals."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What, pray tell, is the "mistake" to which you refer? Please don't tell me that it is along the lines of: "Well, if I was told about the consequences I wouldn't have deferred." While that may be a mistake it isn't something the Code or regulations allow one to "undo". Unless, of course, you are volunteering to assist with an EPCRS filing that incorporates your practical solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite comfortable up here, way up here, on whatever horse you think I'm perched. Most plan sponsors, no matter the size of the plan, don't want to commit fraud. Paychex might have done the plan sponsor a disservice by not adequately informing them of the top-heavy consequences, even to the point of potential liability should the plan sponsor choose to pursue damages, but I would seriously doubt they would knowingly participate in fraud.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for you having Paychex as your administrative firm. Having reviewed and been the takeover contact on many Plans "serviced" by them over the years, I have yet to run across a Plan without issues caused by their "services".

 

It could be that the only Plans that Paychex had problems with were the ones I saw, but I doubt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mike Preston said:

It seems that some of the large 401(k) providers are compartmentalized to the point that there are a number of issues that don't get addressed until the plan sponsor has very few options.

Nobody can answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

However, with that said the answers are:

1) It is probably not everybody,  it is not even necessarily employees "eligible to the plan (6 months of service and over 21 years old) as of 12/31/2015" because not only do they need to satisfy the eligibility criteria they need to also satisfy the entry date criteria. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

2) Typically, top-heavy minimum contributions are not required for participants who have terminated before the end of the year. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

3) Typically, if the highest deferral rate for any key employee is 1% then the top-heavy minimum is also reduced to 1% from 3%.  Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

4) Typically, the top-heavy minimum allocation will be subject to a six year graded vesting schedule (0-20-40-60-80-100). Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

See a pattern? Straight out of the department of redundancy department: Nobody can definitively answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

I would not "lean on" any service provider to commit fraud.  Unless somebody thinks they can get the IRS to allow you and your partner's deferrals to be retroactively re-characterized, I would stay away from any manner of pretense.

You need to hire a competent service provider to review the actual plan document and the actual history of the plan.  Frankly, the first thing I'd take a look at is that 60.7% figure and make doubly sure that is being calculated correctly.  If that number falls to less than 60% it renders the rest of this discussion moot.

And while it is too late to do much for 2016, until this issue gets resolved you should take steps to eliminate any deferrals by any key employee for 2017 (probably just you and your partner).

Good luck.

 

Thanks Mike, very much appreciated.  Regarding question #3, I think addresses this.  There's a section in the plan document called "minimum allocation for top-heavy plans" which states except as otherwise provided in (3) and (4) below, the employer contributions and forfeitures allocated on behalf of any participant who is not a key employee will not be the lesser of three-percent of such participants compensation or (in the case the employer does not maintain a defined benefit plan in addition to this plan that designates this plan to satisfy code 401) the largest percentage of employer contributions and forfeitures, as a percentage of key employees compensation, as defined by 401(a)(17), allocated on behalf of any key employee during the year.

3- excludes employees not employed on last day of the year

4- excludes employees covered under another plan

How do you interpret that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mike Preston said:

It seems that some of the large 401(k) providers are compartmentalized to the point that there are a number of issues that don't get addressed until the plan sponsor has very few options.

Nobody can answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

However, with that said the answers are:

1) It is probably not everybody,  it is not even necessarily employees "eligible to the plan (6 months of service and over 21 years old) as of 12/31/2015" because not only do they need to satisfy the eligibility criteria they need to also satisfy the entry date criteria. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

2) Typically, top-heavy minimum contributions are not required for participants who have terminated before the end of the year. Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

3) Typically, if the highest deferral rate for any key employee is 1% then the top-heavy minimum is also reduced to 1% from 3%.  Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

4) Typically, the top-heavy minimum allocation will be subject to a six year graded vesting schedule (0-20-40-60-80-100). Nobody can definitively answer your question without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

See a pattern? Straight out of the department of redundancy department: Nobody can definitively answer your questions without seeing a copy of the plan document that you signed.

I would not "lean on" any service provider to commit fraud.  Unless somebody thinks they can get the IRS to allow you and your partner's deferrals to be retroactively re-characterized, I would stay away from any manner of pretense.

You need to hire a competent service provider to review the actual plan document and the actual history of the plan.  Frankly, the first thing I'd take a look at is that 60.7% figure and make doubly sure that is being calculated correctly.  If that number falls to less than 60% it renders the rest of this discussion moot.

And while it is too late to do much for 2016, until this issue gets resolved you should take steps to eliminate any deferrals by any key employee for 2017 (probably just you and your partner).

Good luck.

 

For #1, it says entry date = first day of the plan year and first day of the seventh month of the plan year.  If the plan has a 6 month of service requirement, does that mean anyone who started after January 1st, 2016 isn't eligible for the 2016 top-heavy contribution? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mike Preston said:

I'm quite comfortable up here, way up here, on whatever horse you think I'm perched. Most plan sponsors, no matter the size of the plan, don't want to commit fraud. Paychex might have done the plan sponsor a disservice by not adequately informing them of the top-heavy consequences, even to the point of potential liability should the plan sponsor choose to pursue damages, but I would seriously doubt they would knowingly participate in fraud.

 

I'd like to hear more about how they could be liable and what I can do about it.  Here's what happened:

1- We violated the ADP test at 12/31/15, so the owners had to return $15k of excess (returned March 2016).  We were also top heavy and made a $10k contribution last month to correct it.  

2- This was all brand new to us.  We have had the plan for 2 years and had no idea these rules existed (kind of embarrassing I know).   When I talked to a customer service representative about what to do, they processed my return of excess and specifically told me that because of this amount coming out, I should have no problem being under 60% (ie it would get applied back to the 12/31/2015 test date).   Unfortunately I don't have this in writing.

3- Because we thought we were in the clear, the other owner and I each deferred a small amount of our 2016 compensation.  Apparently just enough to get us over 60%.  Had we not been told the excess wouldn't be included in the calc, we obviously wouldn't have. 

 

So frustrating 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mphs77 said:

I feel sorry for you having Paychex as your administrative firm. Having reviewed and been the takeover contact on many Plans "serviced" by them over the years, I have yet to run across a Plan without issues caused by their "services".

 

It could be that the only Plans that Paychex had problems with were the ones I saw, but I doubt it.

Who would you all recommend a small business like myself switch to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know what area of the country you are in, but I would hazard to say any Third Party Administrative firm would provide you adequate service. Look for that kind of firm, not a business of another focus that also provides TPA services as a "benefit to our clients".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

going forward, if all the 'key' employees are age 50 or older, you could ament the plan and put a plan cap of '0%' on them and then they could defer up to $6000 which would be treated as a catch up.

catch up contributions are not included in the ADP test, nor do they count in determining if you need to put in a top heavy for the current year. if there is a match you would not want to match catch ups as matching contributions would require a top heavy contribution  (assuming assets are still over 60% for the top heavy test)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing a good TPA could help you with is if a Safe Harbor plan makes sense for you company.

If you are having both ADP testing problems and Top Heavy problems it might be worth looking into a Safe Harbor plan that can be set up and ran such you get a "bye" on both of those tests.  There are required contributions in a Safe Harbor plan but they can run a cost/benefit analysis for you to decide if it meets your goals at a cost you can accept. 

I agree with others.  In any metro area of any size there are people who do nothing but help administer these kinds of plans.  Also, some CPA firms have departments that do nothing but help administer these kinds of plans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

2- This was all brand new to us.  We have had the plan for 2 years and had no idea these rules existed (kind of embarrassing I know).   When I talked to a customer service representative about what to do, they processed my return of excess and specifically told me that because of this amount coming out, I should have no problem being under 60% (ie it would get applied back to the 12/31/2015 test date).   Unfortunately I don't have this in writing.

Not surprising that this is bad info.

Quote

3- Because we thought we were in the clear, the other owner and I each deferred a small amount of our 2016 compensation.  Apparently just enough to get us over 60%.  Had we not been told the excess wouldn't be included in the calc, we obviously wouldn't have. 

And this is incorrect as well; your 2016 contributions don't impact your 2016 ratio, which is determined as of 12/31/15.  But those contributions are in fact what triggered the TH contribution. 

No need to be embarrassed about not knowing; it's a complex field but unfortunately TH is a classic example of where Paychex and other automated/do-it-yourself "administrators" let you down.  Their business model is basically "you want fries with that payroll service" and depends on low IRS audit rates.

Ed Snyder

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those who probably will get the Top Heavy contribution:  anyone hired on or before 1/1/2016. (Those hired on 1/1/2016 became participants on 7/1/2016).  But anyone no longer with the company on the last day of the year can be excluded. 


Even if the plan says that you only take into consideration pay earned only while a participant for most things, anyone who entered the plan on 7/1/16 (and still there at the end of the year) will get 3% (or whatever TH % is required to be that year)  of their full year's pay.

I said "probably" because I haven't seen the document.  But outfits like Paychex usually don't have clients with wacky provisions in the plan doc.

 

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rushlakeguy said:

2- This was all brand new to us.  We have had the plan for 2 years and had no idea these rules existed (kind of embarrassing I know).   When I talked to a customer service representative about what to do, they processed my return of excess and specifically told me that because of this amount coming out, I should have no problem being under 60% (ie it would get applied back to the 12/31/2015 test date).   Unfortunately I don't have this in writing.

 

8 minutes ago, Bird said:

Not surprising that this is bad info.

Not only bad, but totally wrong.  Any in-service withdrawals will be added back into the plan assets for Top Heavy purposes for 5 years.  (4 years after the year of distribution).  So you are stuck with them for 5 years for each you you have an in-service withdrawal.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, rushlakeguy said:

1- We violated the ADP test at 12/31/15, so the owners had to return $15k of excess (returned March 2016).  We were also top heavy and made a $10k contribution last month to correct it.  

 

So, were you also Top Heavy in 2015?

R. Alexander

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, BG5150 said:

Those who probably will get the Top Heavy contribution:  anyone hired on or before 7/1/2015. (Those hire on 7/1/15 became participants on 7/1/2016).  But anyone no longer with the company on the last day of the year can be excluded. 


Even if the plan says that you only take into consideration pay earned only while a participant for most things, anyone who entered the plan on 7/1/16 (and still there at the end of the year) will get 3% (or whatever TH % is required to be that year)  of their full year's pay.

I said "probably" because I haven't seen the document.  But outfits like Paychex usually don't have clients with wacky provisions in the plan doc.

 

Can you walk me through how you get to 7/1/2015 in your first paragraph?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...