Jump to content

How bad does this mid-year SHM change feel?


AlbanyConsultant

Recommended Posts

I have a client who is just now realizing that the safe harbor match true-up provision they've had in their plan for almost a decade is "costing [them] money" by making them do more match than just what they calculate weekly (I suspect a new bookkeeper).  They want to do a mid-year amendment to remove the annual true-up of the safe harbor match effective ASAP.

 

I don't see where this neatly fits into one of the prohibited amendment boxes, so I'm thinking this might not actually be too bad.  It feels wrong, but maybe that's just me.  If this is OK, would you keep the true-up through a date 30-days in the future (maybe April 30)?

 

Thoughts?  Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

agree you could do it for next plan year, but it is possible that someone already accrued some rights for this year. And I suspect once they explain it to the employees, they will get smarter and spread their deferrals over the whole year to get the whole match, so not sure the employer will save that much except possibly for terminated employees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it cannot be done, but for a separate 'technical' reason.  I don't think 411(d)(6) is applicable because the amendment would be prospective. Anytime (in general) that you want to eliminate the true up during the year, you'd just provide the true up through the effective date of the amendment. But, the idea of actually changing the safe harbor match formula during the year would seem to be the point of contention.  I wouldn't dream of trying to do something like this during the year; but just don't think it's (technically) a cutback issue.

Good Luck!
 

CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A mid-year amendment to the match formula is prohibited under 1.401(k)-3(e)(1).  The modifications to that rule in Notice 2016-16 provide that the only mid-year formula changes allowed are ones made with at least 3 months remaining in the year and that increase the safe harbor contribution.  See Section D of the notice.  The amendment under discussion would result in lower SH amounts for at least some individuals. So, if they do the amendment mid-year,  they would fall under the rules for reducing or suspending the SH contribution under 1.401(k)-3(g) and lose the SH for the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...