jukeboy56 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Subject company has filed 5500 as a small plan for 2013, 2014 and 2015. They recently discovered that a division of the company was not offered the opportunity to participate in those years. The company has done a self-correction for the failure to cover those employees. If participant counts had correctly included the missed employees the plan would have been considered a large plan for 2013, 2014 and 2015. Should the company file amended 5500's for 2013, 2014 and 2015 and hire an independent auditor to audit the Plan for those years? This doesn't fit any fact patterns described in the voluntary correction programs, so how should they proceed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgarath Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Others may have different opinions, but without doing any research or analysis, my gut reaction is to file amended returns (with the audit, of course). jukeboy56 and K2retire 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatherBeGolfing Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 I agree, amend and file with audit. jukeboy56 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillSanDiego CPA Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Agree, file amended returns but use the VFDC (https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/irs-penalty-relief-for-dol-dfvc-filers-of-late-annual-reports ) where the penalty can be capped at $2,000 for the multiple being late with multiple years. Also the program allows the penalties to be abated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now