Jump to content

Amend Plan to exclude certain employees


TPA Bob

Recommended Posts

We have an existing 401(k) safe harbor plan with one year of service, age 21, quarterly entry dates.  Plan Sponsor now wants to exclude certain employees from the Plan (a division of the Plan Sponsor) that would make current participants ineligible for the Plan.  The Plan will easily pass coverage.  

I am sure that this can be done but have a colleague that says these employees will continue to be eligible even if now in an excluded class.

Any thoughts greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't do that mid-year.  See Notice 2016-16, Section III D 2.

Under prohibited mid-year amendments, it lists:

Quote

2. A mid-year change to reduce the number or otherwise narrow the group of employees eligible to receive safe harbor contributions. This prohibition does not apply to an otherwise permissible change under eligibility service crediting rules or entry date rules made with respect to employees who are not already eligible (as of the date the change is either made effective or is adopted) to receive safe harbor contributions under the plan.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, amend eff 1/1/18 to exclude those employees from the definition of eligible employee, no problem, but you need to do so prior to 1/1 and also notify the affected employees in advance, in accordance with ERISA 204(h), either 45 or 15 days prior to 1/1/18 depending on whether the plan is over or under 100 participants.

Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA

Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services

kprell@bpas.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether 204(h) applies or not, doesn't it make sense that you would tell the affected parties?  I would be interested in the communication strategy for telling the affected parties (likely) a year later when the don't get a PS contribution that they had been excluded, but were only being told after the fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's often a big difference between what you MUST do and what you perhaps SHOULD do. So it may be good business practice or employee relations or whatever you want to call it to notify employees sooner rather than later. But the exclusion you describe should be covered in the safe harbor notice, which is given in advance of 2018 anyway. If you think it is necessary to notify them prior to that, that's an employer/HR decision, and I have no opinion - each employer looks at it differently. Some want to notify them immediately - others want to wait as long as possible. The SMM deadline isn't until way into 2018, so the Safe Harbor notice will be the first required notification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...