Flyboyjohn Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 Seeking confirmation before I stick my neck out that if a 501(c)(3) org is maintaining a deferral only 403b and a separate 401a plan which receives employer matching and non-elective contributions there's no defensible argument that the deferral only plan is exempt from ERISA (and exempt from 5500 and plan audit), thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belgarath Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 I believe AO 2012-02A addressed this very question. And as I recall, the DOL said such an arrangement would violate the "completely voluntary" requirement. But don't take my word for it - you may want to check the AO. If you can't find it, I think I have a hard copy lurking in a file somewhere. Flyboyjohn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuseFan Posted September 13, 2017 Report Share Posted September 13, 2017 You are correct. 403(b) Answer Book - Seymon-Hirsch and Anderson-Briggs,Q 11:9,Is an arrangement that provides employer contributions subject to ERISA? Last Updated: 7/2017 Yes. DOL Regulations Section 2510.3-2(f) (see Q 11:2), which sets forth narrow criteria exempting a Section 403(b) arrangement from ERISA, permits an employer to collect salary reduction contributions and forward them to the funding agent. An arrangement that provides any contributions other than salary reduction contributions creates employer involvement beyond what is permitted by the exemption. Such an arrangement would be subject to ERISA unless the employer was otherwise exempt as a governmental or church plan sponsor. Employer matching contributions to a separate plan that are made by the employer on the condition that an employee makes voluntary contributions to a Section 403(b) arrangement would also cause the Section 403(b) arrangement to fail to satisfy the safe harbor. A Section 403(b) plan does not fail to comply with the safe harbor merely because the employer also maintains a qualified Code Section 401(a) plan. However, DOL Advisory Opinion 2012-02A clarifies the DOL view that conditioning employer contributions to the separate plan on the employee making voluntary salary reduction contributions to the Section 403(b) plan would be inconsistent with the limited employer involvement permitted by DOL Regulations Section 2510.3-2(f) (see Q 11:2) and would also conflict with the requirement in DOL Regulations Section 2510.3-2(f) that employee participation in the Section 403(b) arrangement be completely voluntary. Flyboyjohn 1 Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now