AlbanyConsultant Posted March 22, 2018 Report Share Posted March 22, 2018 I can't believe I've never seen this before, but... I've got a 71+ year old non-owner participant not taking RMDs because she is still employed. The plan is terminating in 2018 , but not due to the business closing, so the employee is still going to be employed. Does she have to take a 2018 RMD before she can roll over the remainder of her distribution? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Preston Posted March 22, 2018 Report Share Posted March 22, 2018 No, assuming the plan is drafted accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuseFan Posted March 23, 2018 Report Share Posted March 23, 2018 I agree with Mike, but the plan termination will create a subsequent RMD for this person once the distribution is rolled over, assuming it goes to an IRA and not another plan of the employer. However, that becomes her responsibility and not the plan's (or yours). Kenneth M. Prell, CEBS, ERPA Vice President, BPAS Actuarial & Pension Services kprell@bpas.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbanyConsultant Posted March 23, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2018 I am perfectly OK with this being SEP (Somebody Else's Problem). And, to Mike's point above, the language does seem to support that the RMD does not need to be paid out because she is not retiring. I emailed a question to the doc provider this morning, but haven't heard back yet (it's Datair's new pre-approved 403(b) plan doc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now