Jump to content

vesting for terminated participant


Tom

Recommended Posts

Medical group sells practice July 31, 2018.  Former doctor employee terminated employment in 2016 and is 20% vested in PS source.  The terminated doctor has not incurred forfeiture since he has not been cashed out nor has he had 5 break in service years.  We believe full vesting must occur here.  But the client does not want to provide full vesting due to termination circumstances.  I'm right - right?

Thank you in advance for comments. Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That depends - has the plan been terminated? Just because the practice was sold doesn't mean the plan is terminated. 

Was it a stock sale? Do the new owners want to keep the plan?

Was it an asset sale? Are the current owners terminating the plan? 

Upon plan termination full and immediate vesting is required for all affected participants. When there is a partial termination the IRS is clear that only those that terminated during the year are made 100% vested. For full plan termination though, everyone with a balance is affected, so I don't see how the doctor wouldn't be 100% vested. Maybe someone can provide a cite for what "affected participant" means if different than my understanding. 

I'm a stranger on the internet. Nothing I write is tax or legal advice. 

I'd like a witty saying here, but I don't have any. When in doubt, what does the plan document say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is one case described in the ERISA Outline Book

if termination of plan was part of dissolution of sponsor then basically there would have been no way a terminated person could have returned to work in the future and earned more service, so therefore would not be 100% vested. this was a private letter ruling, so even the Book recommended use with caution.

chapter 4 part A 1.e

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is an asset sale, termination of business activity, all employees terminated, and yes the plan is frozen and terminating as distributions to participants is underway.  So I assume - yes 100% vested.

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...