Jump to content

Government Money Purchase subject to J&S?

Recommended Posts

No.  The requirement that a qualified joint and survivor annuity be provided, unless the spouse consents to a different form, comes from section 401(a)(11), which incorporates by reference section 417.  However, section 401(a)(11) is made inapplicable to governmental plans by the last sentence of section 401(a) (following 401(a)(37)). 

I've got a checklist of which requirements do and do not apply to governmental plans at this link, if that's helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • david rigby changed the title to Government Money Purchase subject to J&S?
1 hour ago, PainPA said:

What is everyone's thought on if a governmental entity adopted (10+years ago) a MPP document that was not structured for governmental plans whereby the J&S is mandatory.   

Is this a protected benefit that cannot be removed?

That would be a question of state law. Governmental plans are not subject to Internal Revenue Code prohibitions on cutbacks of benefits. However, many state courts have held that state constitutional prohibions on the impairment of contracts preclude cutbacks. The existence of such prohibitions, the extent to which they apply (e.g., only to existing accruals or to all future accruals for existing employees), and the extent to which they protect the form of benefits as opposed to just their actuarial value varies from state to state. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...