Jump to content

PLR on Proposed Plan?


kmhaab
 Share

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if the IRS will issue a PLR on the church plan status of a proposed retirement plan?  Sponsor would like to adopt a plan but wants to know what they are getting into. 

I know Rev. Proc. 2020-1 states will not issue a PLR on a "hypothetical situation or alternatives of a proposed transaction," but it's not 100% clear to me the proposed adoption of a plan falls into those categories.

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a little confused by this question.   There are pre-approved 403(b) plans which can be sponsored by churches.  Why doesn't your client just adopt one?   The sticky issue sometimes is whether or not the proposed plan sponsor is actually a church (or comparable religious organization).  If it is clear that the proposed plan sponsor is a church, just help them adopt a pre-approved 403(b) for a Non-Electing Church (assuming they want to not be ERISA) and they will have an IRS Letter which accompanies the Plan.  Let me know if I missed the point of your question!

PNJ

QBI/ Ascensus

Patricia Neal Jensen, JD

Vice President and Nonprofit Practice Leader

|Future Plan, an Ascensus Company

21031 Ventura Blvd., 12th Floor

Woodland Hills, CA 91364

E patricia.jensen@futureplan.com

P 949-325-6727

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. I'm not aware of anything in Rev. Proc. 2011-44 or Rev. Proc. 2011-4 that says a plan cannot be merely in proposed form, and PLRs typically are sought for proposed transactions rather than a done deal ... and yet the point of Rev. Proc. 2011-44 was to add a requirement that "interested persons" be notified of the ruling request, such as plan participants, of which there would be none in a proposed plan situation... Hmm.

Certainly the IRS continues to issue church plan rulings, such as this one from January --

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/202001008.pdf

Does anybody happen to follow these church plan PLRs regularly, who has seen one that addresses a plan that is proposed rather than already-adopted?

Maybe you could make a phone call to Laura Warshawsky, who is the author of the above-cited recent PLR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I am circling back around to this question. 

Patricia - The plan sponsor would like to join an existing multiple employer 403(b) plan for churches, but they are a church-related organization and not an actual church. There is a very strong argument that they are "associated with or controlled by" a church, but the plan administrator will not allow them to join without a Private Letter Ruling. The IRS instructions and checklist for requesting a church plan ruling do not really fit this situation, as we're not requesting a ruling on the actual plan.

I think we would be requesting a ruling on the eligibility of the employer to sponsor a church plan (i.e. are they "associated with or controlled by" a church?), but I am unclear if the IRS will rule on this narrow issue. Any idea?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...