Jump to content

Governmental DB ended up with spousal consent


Bri
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know governmental plans don't have the typical spousal consent requirement.

But if there's a plan that had it, is it considered a cutback to eliminate it? 

Someone's prior TPA used an ERISA document when they shouldn't have.  Anyway it's a closed-to-newbies defined benefit plan with a handful of actives left.  The plan offers various term certain annuities as well as SLA, which in ERISA-land would require spousal consent.  The sponsor is now getting a governmental-entity-specific adoption agreement and I'm wondering if leaving "spousal consent still applies" blank nevertheless requires me to grandfather it as any sort of protected benefit to the spouse.

Thanks.

-bri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The definition of "cutback" in a govt. plan will probably be included in the plan itself.  If it's vague (not surprising), maybe look to other language related to plan interpretation.

  • Thanks 1

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...