Catch22PGM Posted September 3, 2020 Share Posted September 3, 2020 Four different 401(k) plans for a control group. The plan sponsors have always calculated and deposited their safe harbor match every pay period - since 2012. When the documents were restated for PPA their TPA (not me) did not check the box in the adoption agreements to indicate the safe harbor match was calculated and deposited every pay period - instead they are shown as being calculated and deposited at the end of year. I do not have copies of the SPD or Safe Harbor Notices but I would assume they state the same. There has never been a true-up of the safe harbor match in any of the plans. Their TPA had a new account manager take over all four plans for the 2019 plan year and the plan sponsors have been told that they need to go back to 2017 and provide true-up Safe Harbor Match - this is for a few hundred participants each year so we are talking about $100k or more total. Per the TPA's instruction two of the four plan sponsors sent letters to the affected participants notifying them that they will be receiving an additional Safe Harbor Match due to the error. I don't know why they only went back to 2017 instead of when the document errors were created (2014-2016), but those were the instructions given. My initial thought was to retroactively amend the plan documents to conform to its operations, but I could see 411(d)(6) issues. I believe the IRS has accepted retroactive amendments in similar situations. Has anyone had a similar experience that could share how the error was corrected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luke Bailey Posted September 4, 2020 Share Posted September 4, 2020 On 9/3/2020 at 1:48 PM, Catch22PGM said: My initial thought was to retroactively amend the plan documents to conform to its operations, but I could see 411(d)(6) issues. I believe the IRS has accepted retroactive amendments in similar situations. Has anyone had a similar experience that could share how the error was corrected? You might get IRS agreement, but only in VCP. Cannot do with self-correction. Whether IRS would agree or not is based on facts and circumstances. Catch22PGM 1 Luke Bailey Senior Counsel Clark Hill PLC 214-651-4572 (O) | LBailey@clarkhill.com 2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 Frisco, TX 75034 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted September 5, 2020 Share Posted September 5, 2020 Yes, we’ve seen IRS approval of similar issues for retroactive amendments. The IRS will likely ask for copies of the communications provided to participants. They might ask to see how many HCEs vs NHCEs are negatively impacted. Catch22PGM 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catch22PGM Posted September 7, 2020 Author Share Posted September 7, 2020 Thank you both for the insight. I recommended they file under VCP for the retroactive amendment. It's good to hear they have a shot with that approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG5150 Posted September 8, 2020 Share Posted September 8, 2020 But now you have the problem that participants were notified of the problem. Are they going to rescind the notice? "Hey, we screwed up your match, so we are gonna make it right." "On second thought, nope. Psych!" Catch22PGM and Bill Presson 2 QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now