Draper55 Posted February 23, 2021 Share Posted February 23, 2021 If a plan is less than 60% funded so that no accruals can take place can this cause a 401(a)(26) failure? Does it matter if the plan provides for restoration of accruals? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Effen Posted February 24, 2021 Share Posted February 24, 2021 No. No. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Preston Posted February 24, 2021 Share Posted February 24, 2021 5 hours ago, Effen said: No. No. Yes. No. If I'm understanding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Effen Posted February 24, 2021 Share Posted February 24, 2021 How can a mandatory freeze cause an a(26) failure? What would the correction be? The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draper55 Posted February 24, 2021 Author Share Posted February 24, 2021 I am hoping that is not the case(an a(26) failure) as well, but do we have any guidance as such? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Preston Posted February 24, 2021 Share Posted February 24, 2021 5 hours ago, Effen said: How can a mandatory freeze cause an a(26) failure? What would the correction be? I agree it should be however I'm not aware of any guidance that specifically exempts 401a26. Are you?the correction is the same sort of correction you would expect in order to avoid a 436 violation. That is, put money in the plan. Luke Bailey 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C. B. Zeller Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 My first thought would be that of course the plan is exempt from 401(a)(26), since there is an exception for plans that do not benefit any HCEs and if the plan is restricted from benefit accruals due to its AFTAP then no HCEs are benefiting so the exception applies. But if you look at the reg (1.401(a)(26)-1(b)(1)), it says that the exception applies to a plan other than a frozen defined benefit plan which benefits no HCEs. If no one accrues a benefit then you have a frozen plan for this purpose and the exception does not apply. Since no benefits are accruing in the current year you would have to satisfy 401(a)(26) with respect to the plan's former benefit structure, in other words, on an accrued-to-date basis, which could still potentially fail. Mike Preston 1 Free advice is worth what you paid for it. Do not rely on the information provided in this post for any purpose, including (but not limited to): tax planning, compliance with ERISA or the IRC, investing or other forms of fortune-telling, bird identification, relationship advice, or spiritual guidance. Corey B. Zeller, MSEA, CPC, QPA, QKA Preferred Pension Planning Corp.corey@pppc.co Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Preston Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 7 minutes ago, C. B. Zeller said: My first thought would be that of course the plan is exempt from 401(a)(26), since there is an exception for plans that do not benefit any HCEs and if the plan is restricted from benefit accruals due to its AFTAP then no HCEs are benefiting so the exception applies. But if you look at the reg (1.401(a)(26)-1(b)(1)), it says that the exception applies to a plan other than a frozen defined benefit plan which benefits no HCEs. If no one accrues a benefit then you have a frozen plan for this purpose and the exception does not apply. Since no benefits are accruing in the current year you would have to satisfy 401(a)(26) with respect to the plan's former benefit structure, in other words, on an accrued-to-date basis, which could still potentially fail. Very nicely put. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now