Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/10/2014 in Posts

  1. Is the auditor really threatening disqualification without saying why? What do you mean by "We refuse to acknowledge any disqualifying defect"? Do you mean that the auditor has pointed out what he considers to be one or more plan failures sufficient to disqualify the plan but that you refuse to accept that they are failures? Presume, please, that whatever agony the IRS would have to deal with to disqualify the plan is nothing compared to what you would have to deal with if they did. Disqualifications may be rare, but it is not because the IRS is unwilling to push that hard. If they are rare, it is probably because most plan sponsors will realize that going through audit cap would be less expensive and disruptive than if the plan were to be disqualified so they agree to go through audit cap. Have you engaged the services of an ERISA attorney to help you? It might be a good idea.
    1 point
  2. Don't think that's Mr. Rigby's question, 2 cents. In practice, how do plan administrators know/verify that this person who presented them with a distribution request form is actually the deceased participant's surviving spouse? or do you just take their word for it?
    1 point
  3. 3. Who pays cost of amending?
    1 point
  4. you can combine in an way shape or order you please. but what you combine for coverage must also combine for nondiscrim. so you could have ABC A B C AB C AC B A BC one of the things to watch out for is the terminee < 500 hours rules, for one has to be a 'particpant' for that rule to apply. so when testing A by itself, employees of B and C are includable and not benefiting for coverage, even if they quit with < 500 hours. But they would not appear on the ADP test
    1 point
  5. 1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use