Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/15/2014 in Posts
-
I would rely on it if it supports my position, otherwise say that it's not really the law. Seriously, if it clarifies something that is completely muddled, then I think it is helpful. But I do think, in this case, that guidance since then has been clear enough. I think if the original schedule calls for a payment more than 5 years after the issue date, that it's problematic.1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00