Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/19/2018 in Posts

  1. Ok, you may be correct. When you say paid, I take that as income, and if the employer increases the HCI income by $500 per month, there is no Section 105 issue. If the employer decreases the HCI contribution by $500 per month, then there is a Section 105 issue.
    1 point
  2. It relies on the payroll to limit deferrals correctly, but this one is based on 50% of the first 6%... Match.xlsx
    1 point
  3. This is an interesting question. Without researching, I question whether the employer would need to impute any income based on the forgiven debt. The employer's payment of premiums is tax free to the employee under the Code and employees can pay their portion on a pre-tax basis through a cafeteria plan. Wouldn't that mean that forgiving the debt would not be a taxable event?
    1 point
  4. Maybe you can do it (but I think there may be some disclosure issues there - plan sponsors have to be listed by name in the SPD) but I just think it is a terrible idea. I don't like anything that can result in unintended consequences, and that can easily happen when something is "automatic". Larry.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use