A participant was working while they attained age 70.5 back in 1998. They continued to work through 2008. Each year, through 2004, the benefit was increased to reflect additional accruals. After 2004, there were no increases.
We're trying to figure out if the benefit should have been increased after 2004 through termination. I seem to recall a test or rules of some sort for people working past 70.5 and receiving their benefit, something like comparing the present value of the benefit as if it was always being made to the accumulated value of benefits already paid, and if the difference was greater than you increase, otherwise you don't. But, I can't seem to find this anywhere.
Does anyone recall this?
Thanks,