Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Twice in the last two weeks, I've had an auditor tell me that they cannot perform a limited scope audit if a plan is self trusteed. The first auditor was from a firm that I'm usually sceptical of anyway, so it didn't give the issue a lot of thought. Now the issue has come up again and I can't help but wonder if I'm missing something.

My understanding of the limited scope audit was that if the assets were in the CUSTODY of a bank or insurance company or similarly regulated entity, that the auditor could perform a limited scope audit. The assertion that has been made to me is, that if one of these types of entities is not the TRUSTEE of the plan, a full scope audit must be performed.

I've read 29 CFR 2520.103-8 and do not see the word trustee anywhere. I guess I'm looking for a little reassurance that I'm not off my rocker.

Any input would be appreciated.

Posted

Remember you are playing between the CPAs and the DOL. What the CPA is saying is they do not have a full trustee's report, certified by the trustee, as to the transactions and investments.

Without the report, they must do a full audit. The DOL regs tell the CPAs that if they cannot get a report by someone regulated, then the CPA has to check everything.

Posted

I confused by these two statements that you made

One...

they do not have a full trustee's report, certified by the trustee

two...

if they cannot get a report by someone regulated, then the CPA has to check everything

In a hypothetical example, I have a client who's plan is self trusteed. The plan's investments are solely in pooled separate accounts at an insurance company. The insurance company provides a nice, certified annual report. Are you saying that the auditor will not do the limited scope audit because the annual report is not produced by the trustee?

Guest Emiliano
Posted

At the most recent AICPA conference on employee benefit plans, DOL's BMOC made it clear that the certifying institution need not be a trustee that a certification by a custodian would comply with that section of the regulations.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

In the auditors defense, I'm sure he/she picked that up due to the fact that we are told all the time (as auditors) that if a Plan is self trusteed they (the custodian) cannot provide a certification.

As the previous respondent indicated that is categorically untrue. I'm not certain why the auditor cares either, if they do in fact have a certified statement from a custodian...

If your in the New Engalnd area, respond - I'd be happy to have my firm do the limited scope audit...

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use