Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

An HCE terminates in '94. Balance is distributed in '98. My understanding of the top heavy rules is that an employee's account balance is excluded from the top heavy test if that employee has not performed services at any time during the 5 year ending on the determination date. I am running a 12/31/00 test, Quantech is including the distrib. in the top heavy test. How do I get it out of the the test (or should it be in the test and I just don't know the top heavy rules as well as I should)?

Posted

I don't know the Quantech issues, but you are correct about the 5 years. For any participant who does not have a year of service within the last 5 years, you must exclude that person from the top-heavy test (whether or not paid out).

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

Can you change the employees coding in the Census info (Status/Service form) to "former key" or perhaps remove the "key" coding for that individual alltogether? I'm fairly new to Relius so I'm not sure that this will work, but if it doesn't effect anything else in the plan, I would try changing the coding.

Posted

The '98 report (the year of distribution) was done on Pentabs. We transferred the plan to Quantech beginning in '99, so I don't actually see the employee on Quantech. I just see the distrib. in the top heavy test.

Guest Judy Miller
Posted

I think you can just change that in the Top Heavy screen in plan specs.

Posted

You have to remove it from the 98 distributions since there is no tie in to termination date. Make sure your distributions in Relius Top Heavy specs. are for the first year in which no service is performed regardless of when actually distributed

Posted

Thank you for all of the responses. I went ahead and did as Judy Miller & rcline46 suggest and just manually adjusted in the top heavy specs. I generally don't like to do it that way (I'd rather Quantech just do it correctly, so we have better cross checks), but I sometimes I guess we don't have a choice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use