david rigby Posted September 9, 2002 Posted September 9, 2002 Company A is a wholly owned subsidiary of B, and has been for several years. On July 1, the employees of A are no longer paid directly by A (using A's EIN), but are paid directly by B (using B's EIN). Should B recognize the year-to-date Social Security earnings and tax already paid by A's employees? I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
E as in ERISA Posted September 9, 2002 Posted September 9, 2002 I believe that related corporations can only do that if they use "common paymaster" rules (which as allow them to avoid double paying the employer's portion twice).
JanetM Posted September 9, 2002 Posted September 9, 2002 Pax, our payroll dept. says the rule of thumb is if there is more than 25% common ownership you should transfer the wage bases over. JanetM CPA, MBA
mbozek Posted September 9, 2002 Posted September 9, 2002 see IRC 3121(a)(1). Successor employer who acquires substantially all property of a trade or business of a predecessor employer or used in separate unit can aggregate SS wages of predecessor with wages paid by successor employer. mjb
Just Me Posted September 9, 2002 Posted September 9, 2002 The key factor in determining whether or not FICA tax restarts is which entity is the employee's common law employer and whether or not that has changed under your fact scenario. You seem to indicate in your facts that the employee provides services for company A (presumably whom, under the common law 20 factor test, controls the employee) -- if that has not changed, FICA does not restart. A mere change in wage payer shifts the responsibility from one company to the other for withholding and paying over the tax, but does not require that the payers disaggregate their wages for purposes of determining wages for FICA tax purposes. Check out TAM 199918056 which covers this issue.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now