Guest Trirod Posted September 12, 2002 Posted September 12, 2002 I have a client corporation who has a retired executive receiving $50,000 p.a. under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (nonaccount balance). The company wants to buy out this "expense stream" with a lump sum calculated at a discount rate of, say, 6%. The problem is that for FICA taxes when the compensation was earned, they used a discount rate of 12% (which was reasonable at the time). Question: by using a different interest rate now, does the "additional" deferred comp become subject to FICA taxes? I am thinking that it does not because there would be no FICA taxes if the income stream was continued at $50k pa (assuming the 12% was not considered unreasonable), and the company is now just paying out the current PV. Any thoughts? Thanks Rod
MGB Posted September 12, 2002 Posted September 12, 2002 In my opinion: Not only does it create additional FICA tax, but they should have been paying more FICA tax on the 50,000 payouts. As time goes by and the 12% is no longer reasonable, it should be updated.
Guest Trirod Posted September 13, 2002 Posted September 13, 2002 Thank you for your input - but I thought that under the non-duplication rule, so long as the actuarial assumptions are reasonable at the time the deferred comp is earned, it really does not matter what actually happens later? Reg. 31.3121(v)(2)-1(d)(2)(ii).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now